R (Gill) v Secretary of State for Justice
Linked as:
Extract
R (Gill) v Secretary of State for Justice
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
- R (on the application of Brown) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, (Royal Mail Group Ltd and Post Office Ltd (Interested Parties); Equality and Human Rights Commission (Intervening))
- R (James and Others) v Secretary of State for Justice ; R (Walker) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Wells) v Parole Board
- R (Lunt, Allied Vehicles Ltd) v Liverpool City Council
[See more]
CONSIDERS
CONSIDERED in
- Flint v Chief Constable of North Yorkshire Police
- R David Tancock v Secretary of State for Justice
- R Michael Fox v Secretary of State for Justice
[See more]
DISTINGUISHED in
CITED in
- Tadas Lapas’ Application (In the matter of a decision of the Northern Ireland Prison Service (“NIPS”) taken on 26 August 2011 and in the matter of the continued refusal to allow Tadas Lapas access to offending-behaviour work)
- The Queen (on the application of Mrs Pearl Scarfe, Julie Barber and Jamie Blyde) v Governor of HMP Woodhill and Another Inquest (Intervener)
REFERRED in
This document cites
- R (AM) v Birmingham City Council
- R (on the application of Brown) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, (Royal Mail Group Ltd and Post Office Ltd (Interested Parties); Equality and Human Rights Commission (Intervening))
- R (Lunt, Allied Vehicles Ltd) v Liverpool City Council
- R v G (R) (2008)
- Gichura v Home Office
