R Elizabeth Wingfield v Canterbury City Council
Linked as:
Extract
R Elizabeth Wingfield v Canterbury City Council
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
- Human Rights Act 1998
- Town and Country Planning Act 1990 - Articles : S-106
- Human Rights Act 1998
[See more]
CONSIDERS
REFERS TO
- Boddington v British Transport Police
- Smith v East Elloe Rural District Council
- R v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, ex parte Greenpeace Ltd
[See more]
RELIES UPON
- Dianne Smyth v The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Ms Elizabeth Archer Arthur and Others (Interested Parties)
- R (Hart District Council v ((1) The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (2) Luckmore Ltd (3) Barratt Homes Ltd) v ((1) Tayor Wimpey Developments Ltd (2) Natural England Interested Parties
CONSIDERED in
- C G Fry & Son Ltd v Secretary of State for Levelling Up Housing and Communities
- The King on the application of Together Against Sizewell C Ltd v Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero
REFERRED in
This document cites
- Dianne Smyth v The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Ms Elizabeth Archer Arthur and Others (Interested Parties)
- Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Another v Wealden District Council
- R (on the application of Champion) v North Norfolk District Council and another
- Smith v East Elloe Rural District Council
- No Adastral New Town Ltd (Claimant/Appellant) v (1) Suffolk Coastal District Council (2) Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (Interested Party/Respondent)
