Extract
R (Countryside Alliance and Others) v Attorney-General and Another
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
REFERS TO
CONSIDERS
REPORTED OPINION OF in
CONSIDERED in
-
Modi v United Kingdom Border Agency
-
R Uk Business Academy v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
-
Solaria Energy UK Ltd v Department for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy
[See more]
-
R (Sinclair Collis Ltd) v Secretary of State for Health
-
The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v Jamie Thorpe
-
Security Industry Authority v Stewart and another
-
R Taste of India Ltd v Secretary of State for the Home Department
-
Atapattu Liyanaralalage Luck Saman Atapattu v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
-
Mr Leigh Ravenscroft v Canal and River Trust
-
R (Petsafe Ltd) v Welsh Ministers
-
Eventech Ltd (Claimant) The Parking Adjudicator (Defendant) London Borough of Camden and Another (Interested Parties)
-
Hannah Beety and Others v Nursing and Midwifery Council Independent Midwives UK and Another (Interested Parties)
-
Bank Mellat v HM Treasury
-
The London Criminal Courts Solicitors Association and the Criminal Law Solicitors Association and Nelson Guest and Partners (1st Claimant) v The Lord Chancellor
-
Transport for London v John Griffin and Others
-
Sinclair Collis Ltd For Judicial Review Of The Tobacco And Primary Health Services
-
Leslie Malcolm v Secretary of State for Justice
-
The Queen (on the application of Rights of Women) v The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice
-
Bank Mellat v HM Treasury
-
Breyer Group Plc v Department of Energy and Climate Change
-
R (Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
-
David Axon (Claimant) Ministry of Defence (Defendant) News Group Newspapers Ltd (Third Party)
-
Rebecca Hannah Steinfeld & Charles Robin Keidan v Secretary of State for Education
-
R (on the application of Conway) v The Secretary of State for Justice
-
(1) Ineos Upstream Ltd and Others v (1) Persons Unknown Entering or Remaining Without the Consent of the Claimant(s) on Land and Buildings Shown Shaded Red on the Plans Attached to the Amended Claim Form (First Defendant) (2) Persons Unknown Interfering with The First and Second Claimants' Rights to Pass and Repass with or Without Vehicles, Materials and Equipment over Private Access Roads Onland Shown Shaded Orange on the Plans Annexed to the Amended Claim form Without the Consent of the Claimant(S) (Second Defendant) (3) Persons Unknown Interfering with the Right of way Enjoyed by the Claimant(s)/or Its Affiliates and Each of its and their Agents, Servants, Contractors, Sub-Contractors, Group Companies, Licensees, Employees, Partners, Consultants, Family Members and Friends Over
-
R (Purdy) v DPP
-
R (Countryside Alliance and Others) v Attorney-General and Another
-
Hafiz Mohammed Abdul Ghani Rashid and Inayat Fatima v The Chief Immigration Officer and The Minister of National Security
-
SXH v Crown Prosecution Service
CITED in
REFERRED in
APPLIED in
APPEAL RESOLVED in