Extract
Quid leges sine moribus vanae proficient: a balancing approach to the postmortem application of the attorney-client privilege.
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
This document cites
-
Federal Cases - 124 F. 250 (N.D.N.Y. 1903), Burden v. Burden
-
Federal Cases - 194 F.3d 363 (2nd Cir. 1999), 98-9268, Elliott Assoc. v Banco De La Nacion
-
Federal Cases - 154 F.Supp.2d 706 (S.D.N.Y. 2001), 97 Civ. 2559, Morales v. Portuondo
-
Federal Cases - 988 F.Supp. 1460 (N.D.Ga. 1997), Civ. 2 97-CV-52, Ramada Franchise System v. Hotel of Gainesville Associates
-
Federal Cases - 176 F.R.D. 93 (S.D.N.Y. 1997), 96 CIV. 7917(RWS), Elliott Associates, L.P. v. Republic of Peru
See all quotations
-
Federal Cases - 124 F.3d 230 (D.C. Cir. 1997), 97-3006, In re Sealed Case
-
Federal Cases - 445 U.S. 40 (1980), 78-5705, Trammel v. United States
-
Federal Cases - 449 U.S. 383 (1981), 79-886, Upjohn Co. v. United States
-
Federal Cases - 483 U.S. 171 (1987), 85-6725, Bourjaily v. United States
-
Federal Cases - 493 U.S. 182 (1990), 88-493, University of Pennsylvania v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
-
Federal Cases - 524 U.S. 399 (1998), 97-1192, Swidler & Berlin v. United States
-
Federal Cases - 290 U.S. 371 (1933), 394, Funk v. United States
-
Federal Cases - 291 U.S. 7 (1934), 338, Wolfle v. United States
-
Federal Cases - 295 U.S. 78 (1935), 544, Berger v. United States
-
Federal Cases - 339 U.S. 323 (1950), 99, United States v. Bryan
-
Federal Cases - 353 U.S. 53 (1957), 58, Roviaro v. United States
-
Federal Cases - 410 U.S. 284 (1973), 71-5908, Chambers v. Mississippi
-
Federal Cases - 418 U.S. 683 (1974), 73-1766, United States v. Nixon
-
Federal Cases - 425 U.S. 391 (1976), 74-18, Fisher v. United States
-
Federal Cases - 441 U.S. 153 (1979), 77-1105, Herber v. Lando
-
Arizona - 544 P.2d 1084 (Ariz. 1976), 3122, State v. Macumber
-
California - 235 Cal.App.3d 1584, C011854, Rittenhouse v. Superior Court
-
Indiana - 670 N.E.2d 1262 (Ind. 1996), 32S00-9411-CR-1076, Mayberry v. State
-
Indiana - 95 N.E.2d 304 (Ind.App. 1950), 18008, Buuck v. Kruckeberg
-
Illinois - 650 N.E.2d 974 (Ill. 1995), 73616, People v. Knuckles
-
Illinois - 675 N.E.2d 275 (Ill.App. 4 Dist. 1997), 4-96-0156, Hitt v. Stephens
-
Massachusetts - 408 Mass. 480 (1990), John Doe Grand Jury Investigation, Matter of
-
North Carolina - 367 S.E.2d 609 (N.C. 1988), 123PA86, Raritan River Steel Co. v. Cherry, Bekaert & Holland
-
Missouri - 283 S.W.2d 493 (Mo. 1955), 44174, Walton v. Van Camp
-
Missouri - 533 S.W.2d 264 (Mo.App. 1976), 36534, McCaffrey v. Brennan's Estate
-
North Carolina - 584 S.E.2d 772 (N.C. 2003), 303PA02, In re Miller
-
New Jersey - 327 A.2d 687 (N.J.Super.L. 1974), Frank Briscoe Co., Inc. v. Rutgers, the State University and College of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey
-
Nevada - 692 P.2d 512 (Nev. 1985), 15339, Clark v. Second Judicial Dist. Court
-
New York - 100 Misc.2d 627, Potamkin Cadillac Corp. v. Karmgard
-
Pennsylvania - 357 A.2d 689 (Pa.Super. 1976), Cohen v. Jenkintown Cab Co.