The qualitative vs. quantitative approach to nonconforming uses under section 52-61 of the New York City Zoning Resolution: the Toys case.

This document cites

• New York - Lindstrom v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Town of Warwick
• New York - Verstandig's Florist Inc. v. Board of Appeals of Town of Bethlehem
• New York - Allen v. Adami
• New York - Baml Realty, Inc. v. State
• New York - Town of Islip v. P.B.S. Marina, Inc.



See all quotations

• New York - Lincoln Trust Co. v. Williams Bldg. Corp.
• New York - Udell v. Haas
• New York - Harbison v. City of Buffalo
• New York - Campbell v. Rose
• New York - Syracuse Aggregate Corp. v. Weise
• New York - Toys R Us v. Silva
• New York - Village of Valatie v. Smith
• New York - Exxon Corp. v. Board of Standards and Appeals of City of New York
• New York - Toys R Us v. Silva
• New York - Neville v. Koch
• Federal Cases - Village of Euclid, Ohio v. Ambler Realty Co
• New York - Toys R Us v. Silva
• New York - Rice v. Van Vranken
• Colorado - City of Greeley v. Ells
• Federal Cases - Louis Reinman v. City of Little Rock
• Maryland - Canada's Tavern, Inc. v. Town of Glen Echo
• Federal Cases - Hadacheck v. Sebastian
• Wisconsin - State ex rel. Morehouse v. Hunt
• New York - Thomson Industries, Inc. v. Incorporated Village of Port Washington North
• New York - People v. Hicks
• New York - Trump-Equitable Fifth Ave. Co. v. Gliedman, TRUMP-EQUITABLE
• New York - Merrick Gables Ass'n v. Fields
• New York - Peter Glennon Buick-Cadillac, Inc. v. County of Suffolk, BUICK-CADILLA
• New York - Charles A. Field Delivery Service, Inc., Matter of
• Wisconsin - State ex rel. Schaetz v. Manders