Purging contempt: eliminating the distinction between civil and criminal contempt.

This document cites

• Federal Cases - 116 F.3d 952 (1st Cir. 1997), 97-1480, United States v. Perry
• Federal Cases - 481 U.S. 787 (1987), 85-1329, Young v. United States ex rel. Vuitton et Fils S.A.
• Federal Cases - 485 U.S. 624 (1988), 86-787, Hicks v. Feiock
• Federal Cases - 512 U.S. 821 (1994), 92-1625, Mine Workers v. Bagwell
• Federal Cases - 520 U.S. 751 (1997), 95-1726, United States v. LaBonte



See all quotations

• Federal Cases - 543 U.S. 220 (2005), 04-104, United States v. Booker
• Federal Cases - 19 U.S. 204 (1821), Anderson v. Dunn
• Federal Cases - 194 U.S. 324 (1904), 142, Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Company
• Federal Cases - 194 U.S. 458 (1904), 16, Matter of Christensen Engineering Company
• Federal Cases - 204 U.S. 599 (1907), 155, Doyle v. London Guarantee and Accident Company, Limited
• Federal Cases - 221 U.S. 418 (1911), 372, Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Company
• Federal Cases - 247 U.S. 402 (1918), 371, Toledo Newspaper Co. v. United States
• Federal Cases - 266 U.S. 42 (2010), Michaelson v. United States ex Rel. Chicago, St. Paul,
• Federal Cases - 267 U.S. 87 (1925), 24, Ex Parte Grossman
• Federal Cases - 313 U.S. 33 (1941), 558, Nye v. United States
• Federal Cases - 343 U.S. 1 (1952), 201, Sacher v. United States
• Federal Cases - 356 U.S. 165 (1958), 100, Green v. United States
• Federal Cases - 384 U.S. 364 (1966), 412, Shillitani v. United States
• Federal Cases - 86 U.S. 505 (1874), Ex Parte Robinson
• Federal Cases - 391 U.S. 145 (1968), 410, Duncan v. Louisiana
• Federal Cases - 391 U.S. 194 (1968), 52, Bloom v. Illinois
• Federal Cases - 400 U.S. 455 (1971), 121, Mayberry v. Pennsylvania
• Alaska - 491 P.2d 759 (Alaska 1971), 1309, Johansen v. State
• Alabama - 393 So.2d 1368 (Ala. 1981), 79-351, Carter v. State ex rel. Bullock County
• Arkansas - 238 S.W.3d 902 (Ark. 2006), 05-666, Stilley v. Fort Smith School Dist.
• Arkansas - 278 S.W.3d 569 (Ark.App. 2008), CA 07-247, Norman v. Cooper
• Arkansas - 307 S.W.3d 608 (Ark.App. 2009), CA 08-955, Holifield v. Mullenax Financial & Tax Advisory Group, Inc.
• Arkansas - 92 S.W.3d 671 (Ark. 2002), 02-283, Ivy v. Keith
• Alabama - 769 So.2d 294 (Ala. 2000), 1981370, Chestang v. Chestang
• Alabama - 934 So.2d 1070 (Ala.Civ. 2005), 2040214, Pate v. Guy
• California - 70 Cal.2d 8, 12698, In re McKinney
• Delaware - 858 A.2d 317 (Del. 2004), 321,2003, In re Hillis
• Colorado - 186 P.3d 88 (Colo.App. 2008), 06CA1444, In re Marriage of Cyr
• Hawaii - 994 P.2d 546 (Hawai'i 2000), 22284, LeMay v. Leander
• Georgia - 502 S.E.2d 233 (Ga. 1998), S98A0813, Hughes v. Georgia Dept. of Human Resources