Public Prosecutor v Lee Ngin Kiat

Core Citations

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Public Prosecutor v Lee Ngin Kiat

DISTINGUISHES

• DPP v Nock
• R v Smith (Roger) ; Haughton v Smith

DOES NOT FOLLOW

• Lim Hong Yap v Public Prosecutor

REFERS TO

• Wong Kee Chin v Public Prosecutor
• Cheng Mun Siah v Tan Nam Sui
• Poon Soh Har and Another v Public Prosecutor

AFFIRMS

• Public Prosecutor v Lee Ngin Kiat

REFERRED in

• Ooi Chee Seong v Public Prosecutor
• Choo Pheng Soon v Public Prosecutor
• Mohd Halmi bin Hamid and Another v Public Prosecutor

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1993] SGCA 29
• [1993] 2 SLR 511

FOLLOWED in

• Daw Aye Aye Mu v Public Prosecutor

DISTINGUISHED in

• Chin Siong Kian v Public Prosecutor

This document cites

• R v Smith (Roger) ; Haughton v Smith
• Haughton v Smith
• DPP v Nock
• R v Oxford Justices, ex parte H
• Wong Kee Chin v Public Prosecutor



See all quotations

• Poon Soh Har and Another v Public Prosecutor
• Cheng Mun Siah v Tan Nam Sui
• Public Prosecutor v Lee Ngin Kiat
• Lim Hong Yap v Public Prosecutor
• Penal Code 1871
• Supreme Court of Judicature Act
• Criminal Procedure Code 2010