Prosecuting Corporate Crime when Firms Are Too Big to Jail: Investigation, Deterrence, and Judicial Review.

This document cites

• Federal Cases - 79 F.Supp.3d 160 (D.D.C. 2015), 14-cr-121 (RJL), United States v. Fokker Servs. B.V.
• Federal Cases - 470 U.S. 598 (1985), 83-1292, Wayte v. United States
• Federal Cases - 487 U.S. 654 (1988), 87-1279, Morrison v. Olson
• Federal Cases - 544 U.S. 696 (2005), 04-368, Andersen LLP v. United States
• Federal Cases - 556 U.S. 662 (2009), 07-1015, Ashcroft v. Iqbal



See all quotations

• Federal Cases - 158 U.S. 564 (1885), 11, In re Debs
• Federal Cases - 212 U.S. 481 (1909), 57, New York Central and Hudson River
• Federal Cases - 418 U.S. 87 (1974), 73-507, Hamling v. United States
• Federal Cases - 434 U.S. 357 (1978), 76-1334, Bordenkircher v. Hayes
• Federal Cases - 442 U.S. 114 (1979), 78-776, United States v. Batchelder
• Federal Cases - 818 F.3d 733 (D.C. Cir. 2016), 15-3016, United States v. Fokker Services B. V.
• Federal Cases - 140 F.Supp.3d 11 (D.D.C. 2015), Crim. 14-66 (EGS), United States v. Saena Tech Corp.
• Federal Cases - 177 F.Supp.3d 219 (D.D.C. 2016), C. A. 15-0045 (RMC), MetLife, Inc. v. Financial Stability Oversight Council
• Federal Cases - 863 F.3d 125 (2nd Cir. 2017), 16-308(L), United States v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.
• COURT of APPEAL. ; A v Ministry of Defence and Another