Procter and another v Procter and Others

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 - Articles : S-2
• Agricultural Holdings Act 1986
• Agricultural Holdings Act 1986 - Articles : S-1

[See more]

• Agricultural Holdings Act 1986 - Articles : S-2
• Landlord and Tenant Act 1954
• Law of Property Act 1925
• Law of Property Act 1925 - Articles : S-34
• Law of Property Act 1925 - Articles : S-52
• Law of Property Act 1925 - Articles : S-54
• Law of Property Act 1925 - Articles : S-72
• Law of Property Act 1925 - Articles : S-82
• Law of Property Act 1925 - Articles : S-185
• Law of Property Act 1925 - Articles : S-205
• Law of Property Act 1925 - Articles : SCH-7
• Conveyancing Act 1881 - Articles : S-50

REFERS TO

• Barrett and Others v Morgan
• Ingram and Another v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
• Hindcastle Ltd v Barbara Attenborough Associates Ltd

[See more]

• Johnson v Moreton
• Wheeler v Mercer
• Ramnarace v Lutchman
• Re Grayan Building Services Ltd
• Steyning & Littlehampton Building Society v Wilson
• Rye v Rye
• Napier v Williams
• Ellis v Kerr
• Chambers v Kingham
• Rowley v Adams
• Capital and Counties Bank Ltd v Rhodes
• Dow d Davies v James Thomas
• JA Pye (Oxford) Ltd v United Kingdom (44302/02)
• Dr Sonny Lie (Claimant/Appellant) v Dr Rajan Mohile
• The British Council v David Jeffery
• Bannerman Town, Millars and John Millars Eleuthera Association v Eleuthera Properties Ltd
• Walters and Others v Roberts
• Philip John Procter v Suzanne Elaine Procter
• Murphy v Ingram
• Street v Mountford
• Morton v Woods
• Churcher v Martin
• Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council v Monk
• Thomas Henry Rowley, and his brothers and sisters; and William Henry Orchard, and his brothers and sisters, - Appellants; Samuel Adams and Edmund Marks and Others (Original Appeal), - Respondents. The said s. Adams and E. Marks, - Appellants; The said T. H. Howley, and all the other Appellants and Respondents in the original appeal (Cross Appeal), - Respondents. William Wyatt, - Appellant; The said S. Adams and E. Marks and Others, - Respondents
• Rogers v Harvey and Others
• Grey v Ellison
• Faulkner v Richard Lowe

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2021] 2 WLR 1249
• [2021] CH 395
• [2022] 1 All ER 358

REFERRED in

• Suzanne Elaine Procter v Philip John Procter
• Nihal Mohammed Kamal Brake v The Chedington Court Estate Ltd
• Annington Property Ltd v The Secretary of State for Defence

CONSIDERED in

• The Companies Act (2022 Revision) (as Amended) and Oriente Group Ltd

This document cites

• Ingram and Another v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
• Hindcastle Ltd v Barbara Attenborough Associates Ltd
• JA Pye (Oxford) Ltd v United Kingdom (44302/02)
• Wheeler v Mercer
• Murphy v Ingram



See all quotations

• Barrett and Others v Morgan
• Johnson v Moreton
• Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council v Monk
• Dr Sonny Lie (Claimant/Appellant) v Dr Rajan Mohile
• Rye v Rye
• Chambers v Kingham
• Capital and Counties Bank Ltd v Rhodes
• Napier v Williams
• Steyning & Littlehampton Building Society v Wilson
• Ellis v Kerr
• Street v Mountford
• Faulkner v Richard Lowe
• Dow d Davies v James Thomas
• Morton v Woods
• Walters and Others v Roberts
• Churcher v Martin
• Rowley v Adams
• Bannerman Town, Millars and John Millars Eleuthera Association v Eleuthera Properties Ltd
• Thomas Henry Rowley, and his brothers and sisters; and William Henry Orchard, and his brothers and sisters, - Appellants; Samuel Adams and Edmund Marks and Others (Original Appeal), - Respondents. The said s. Adams and E. Marks, - Appellants; The said T. H. Howley, and all the other Appellants and Respondents in the original appeal (Cross Appeal), - Respondents. William Wyatt, - Appellant; The said S. Adams and E. Marks and Others, - Respondents
• Re Grayan Building Services Ltd
• Rogers v Harvey and Others
• Grey v Ellison
• Ramnarace v Lutchman
• The British Council v David Jeffery
• Philip John Procter v Suzanne Elaine Procter