Price v Strange

Core Citations

---

REFERS TO

• Wilkinson v Clements
• Eastwood v Lever
• Leeds Industrial Co-operative Society Ltd v Slack

[See more]

• Dietrichsen v Cabburn
• Wakeham v Mackenzie
• Parker v Taswell
• Hart v Hart
• Peto v Brighton, Uckfield and Tunbridge Wells Railway Company
• Chalmers v Pardoe
• Lumley v Wagner
• Hoggart v Scott
• Elliott and H. Elliott (Builders) v Pierson
• Soames v Edge
• Lowther v Heaver
• Hills v Croll
• Langen & Wind Ltd v Bell
• Wrotham Park Estate Company Ltd v Parkside Homes Ltd
• Mundy v Jolliffe
• South-Eastern Railway Company v Knott
• Rawlinson v Ames
• Blackett v Bates
• Sutherland v Briggs
• Maddison v Alderson

FOLLOWS

• Halkett v Dudley (Earl)

APPLIES

• The Directors, Company, of the Eastern Counties Railway Company, - Appellants; Henry Hawkes, - Respondent

APPROVES

• Giles (C. H.) & Company Ltd v Morris

CONSIDERS

• Salisbury v Hatcher
• Stickney v Keeble
• O'Regan v White

[See more]

• Re Bayley and Shoesmith's Contract
• Kirkland v Bird
• Joseph v National Magazine Company Ltd
• Chancery Amendment Act 1858 - Articles : S-II
• Law of Property Act 1925 - Articles : S-146
• Law of Property Act 1925 - Articles : S-40
• Chancery Amendment Act 1858

DISTINGUISHES

• Lavery v Pursell
• Ogden v Fossick
• Hope v Hope

[See more]

• Murrell v Goodyear

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1977] EWCA Civ J0427-2
• [1977] 3 All ER 371
• [1977] 2 EGLR 49

[See more]

• [1977] 3 WLR 943
• [1978] CH 337

REFERRED in

• Pips (Leisure Productions) Ltd v Walton
• Multazam Development Sdn Bhd v Felda Global Ventures Plantations (M) Sdn Bhd
• Lyus v Prowsa Developments Ltd

[See more]

• Andrey Rogachev v Mikhail Goryainov
• Ridgewood Properties Group Ltd and Others v Valero Energy Ltd (Pannone & Partners (A Firm), Part 20 defendant)
• Duffy v Ridley Properties Ltd
• Lee Cheng Kang and Another v Lee Tian Kai

APPLIED in

• Sutton v Sutton
• Gaynes Park Mansion, Epping, Essex, Re; Rainbow Estates Ltd v Tokenhold Ltd
• E Johnson & Company (Barbados) Ltd v NSR Ltd

CITED in

• Patel v Ali
• Mary Egan and Paul Barron v Noel Thomas Richard Heatley
• Thomas Mowry Appellant v David Payne Respondent (1) Woodsville Development Corporation Ltd Respondent (2) Hogarth Sergeant Respondent (3) [ECSC]

[See more]

• Abbey Healthcare (Mill Hill) Ltd v Simply Construct (UK) LLP

CONSIDERED in

• Progress Aviation S.A. and Another (Appellants (Plaintiffs) v Americom Leasing Group Inc. (Respondents
• Underground Location Services Ltd (1st Plaintiffs) U.L.S. Marine Ltd (2nd Plaintiffs) Bryan Sidney West (3rd Plaintiffs) McElhanney Offshore Surveying & Engineering Ltd (1st Defendants) McElhanney Offshore Holdings Ltd (2nd Defendants)
• Patricia Ann Jones and Another v Timothy Paul Oven and Another

[See more]

• C&P Syndicate Pty Ltd v Reddy
• Vaughan v Duncan Vogt v Duncan
• Re Galaxy Media Pty Ltd (Rec/Mgrs apptd.) (in Liquidation)
• Ministry of Sound (Ireland) Ltd v World Online Ltd
• Between: Park Lane Ventures Ltd (in Administrative Receivership) v (1) IAN KELVIN LOCKE (2) DAWN SMALLMAN
• A-G of England and Wales v R
• Kymbo pty v paxton management pty Ltd
• [1] Mills v Ruthol Pty Ltd; [2] Tricon v Ruthol
• Australian Hardboards Ltd v Hudson Investment Group Ltd
• Andrey Rogachev v Mikhail Goryainov
• Sookrajh v Samaroo et Al
• Sheik Mohamed Adam v Mohamed Mursalin
• Ramsey v Miller
• Pompey v Rajmattie Mahadeo and Another
• E Johnson & Company (Barbados) Ltd v N S R Ltd
• Mowry v Payne et Al
• E. Johnson & Company (Barbados) Ltd v N.S.R Ltd
• Bolkiah and Others v The State of Brunei Darussalam
• Sealy v Sealy
• L.L. Holdings Ltd v Hoad
• Tesco Stores Ltd v Union of Shop, Distributive and Allied Workers and Others
• E. Johnson & Company (B'Dos) Ltd v NSR Ltd
• Abbey Healthcare (Mill Hill) Ltd v Simply Construct (UK) LLP

FOLLOWED in

• Insofex Sdn Bhd v Labasama Group (M) Sdn Bhd (No 2)
• Insofex Sdn Bhd v Labasama Group Sdn Bhd
• Shiffon Creations (Singapore) Pte Ltd v Tong Lee Company Pte Ltd

[See more]

• Sheriffa Taibah bte Abdul Rahman v Lim Kim Som

This document cites

---

• Maddison v Alderson
• Leeds Industrial Co-operative Society Ltd v Slack
• Lowther v Heaver
• Elliott and H. Elliott (Builders) v Pierson
• Dietrichsen v Cabburn



See all quotations

• Hope v Hope
• Hart v Hart
• Halkett v Dudley (Earl)
• Wakeham v Mackenzie
• Re Bayley and Shoesmith's Contract
• Joseph v National Magazine Company Ltd
• O'Regan v White
• Wrotham Park Estate Company Ltd v Parkside Homes Ltd
• Hills v Croll
• Peto v Brighton, Uckfield and Tunbridge Wells Railway Company
• Salisbury v Hatcher
• Lumley v Wagner
• Blackett v Bates
• Chalmers v Pardoe
• Langen & Wind Ltd v Bell
• Giles (C. H.) & Company Ltd v Morris
• The Directors, Company, of the Eastern Counties Railway Company, - Appellants; Henry Hawkes, - Respondent
• Hoggart v Scott
• Soames v Edge
• Rawlinson v Ames
• Sutherland v Briggs
• Eastwood v Lever
• Wilkinson v Clements
• Parker v Taswell
• Lavery v Pursell
• Stickney v Keeble
• South-Eastern Railway Company v Knott
• Ogden v Fossick
• Murrell v Goodyear
• Kirkland v Bird