Sean Price v MGN Ltd

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Burstein v Times Newspapers Ltd

REFERS TO

• Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd
• Jameel (Yousef) v Dow Jones & Company Inc.
• Bruno Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd

[See more]

• Scott v Sampson
• Burstein v Times Newspapers Ltd
• Carlton Communications Plc and Another v News Group Newspapers Ltd
• Dow Jones & Company Inc. v Yousef Abdul Latif Jameel
• Vladimir Bukovsky (Appellant Claimant) v Crown Prosecution Service (Respondent Defendant)

APPLIES

• Dingle v Associated Newspapers Ltd

CITES

• Tucker v Secretary of State for Social Security

CONSIDERS

• Jeynes v News Magazines Ltd and Another
• Easy Air Ltd v Opal Telecom Ltd
• Speidel v Plato Films Ltd

[See more]

• Defamation Act 2013
• Civil Evidence Act 1968 - Articles : S-13
• Defamation Act 1952 - Articles : S-5
• Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000
• Defamation Act 2013 - Articles : S-1
• Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000
• Defamation Act 2013 - Articles : S-2

CONSIDERED in

• Sean Price v MGN Ltd
• Rachel Riley v Mike Sivier
• Fiona George v Linda Cannell

REFERRED in

• Tina Hamilton v News Group Newspapers Ltd
• Sean Price v Newsquest Media Group Ltd
• Andrew Peck v Williams Trade Supplies Ltd

CITED in

• Tina Hamilton v News Group Newspapers Ltd

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2018] 4 WLR 150

This document cites

• Tucker v Secretary of State for Social Security
• Carlton Communications Plc and Another v News Group Newspapers Ltd
• Jeynes v News Magazines Ltd and Another
• Burstein v Times Newspapers Ltd
• Speidel v Plato Films Ltd



See all quotations

• Dingle v Associated Newspapers Ltd
• Easy Air Ltd v Opal Telecom Ltd
• Bruno Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd
• Dow Jones & Company Inc. v Yousef Abdul Latif Jameel
• Burstein v Times Newspapers Ltd
• Jameel (Yousef) v Dow Jones & Company Inc.
• Scott v Sampson
• Defamation Act 2013
• Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000
• Defamation Act 1952
• Civil Evidence Act 1968
• Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd
• Vladimir Bukovsky (Appellant Claimant) v Crown Prosecution Service (Respondent Defendant)