Pregnant drug users, fetal persons, and the threat to Roe v. Wade.

This document cites

• Federal Cases - 162 F.3d 732 (2nd Cir. 1998), 18, United States v. Lynch
• Federal Cases - 952 F.Supp. 167 (S.D.N.Y. 1997), United States v. Lynch
• Federal Cases - 962 F.2d 1366 (9th Cir. 1992), 90-16706, Guam Soc. of Obstetricians and Gynecologists v. Ada
• Federal Cases - 974 F.2d 27 (5th Cir. 1992), 91-3677, Sojourner T v. Edwards
• Federal Cases - 450 U.S. 398 (1981), 79-5903, H. L. v. Matheson,



See all quotations

• Federal Cases - 462 U.S. 416 (1983), 81-746, City of Akron v. Akron Center For Reproductive Health, Inc.
• Federal Cases - 476 U.S. 747 (1986), 84-495, Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists
• Federal Cases - 492 U.S. 490 (1989), 88-605, Webster v. Reproductive Health Services
• Federal Cases - 497 U.S. 417 (1989), Hodgson v. Minnesota
• Federal Cases - 499 U.S. 187 (1991), 89-1215, International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace &
• Federal Cases - 500 U.S. 173 (1990), Rust v. Sullivan
• Federal Cases - 505 U.S. 833 (1992), Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey
• Federal Cases - 506 U.S. 263 (1993), 90-985, Bray v. Alexandria Women's Health Clinic
• Federal Cases - 268 U.S. 5 (1925), 183, Linder v. United States
• Federal Cases - 274 U.S. 200 (1927), 292, Buck v. Bell
• Federal Cases - 316 U.S. 535 (1942), 782, Skinner v. Oklahoma ex rel. Williamson
• Federal Cases - 370 U.S. 660 (1962), 554, Robinson v. California
• Federal Cases - 392 U.S. 514 (1968), 405, Powell v. Texas
• Federal Cases - 410 U.S. 113 (1973), 70-18, Roe v. Wade
• Federal Cases - 417 U.S. 484 (1974), 73-640, Geduldig v. Aiello
• Federal Cases - 432 U.S. 464 (1977), 75-1440, Maher v. Roe
• Federal Cases - 429 U.S. 125 (1976), 74-1589, General Electric Co. v. Gilbert
• Federal Cases - 443 U.S. 622 (1979), 78-329, Bellotti v. Baird
• Arizona - 894 P.2d 733 (Ariz.App. Div. 1 1995), 1 CA-SA 94-0348, Reinesto v. Superior Court of State In and For County of Navajo
• Arizona - 905 P.2d 555 (Ariz.App. Div. 2 1995), 2 CA-JV 94-0049, Matter of Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Severance Action No. S-120171
• Arizona - 941 P.2d 237 (Ariz.App. Div. 2 1997), 2 CA-CV 96-0175, In re Marriage of Tonnessen
• California - 75 Cal.App.3d 214, 19134, Reyes v. Superior Court
• Georgia - 419 S.E.2d 32 (Ga.App. 1992), A92A0233, State v. Luster
• Florida - 585 So.2d 1140 (Fla.App. 4 Dist. 1991), 89-2961, State v. Gethers
• Florida - 602 So.2d 1288 (Fla. 1992), 77831, Johnson v. State
• Florida - 701 So.2d 338 (Fla. 1997), 87719, State v. Ashley
• Illinois - 531 N.E.2d 355 (Ill. 1988), 64957, Stallman v. Youngquist
• Illinois - 632 N.E.2d 326 (Ill.App. 1 Dist. 1994), 1-93-4322, In re Baby Boy Doe
• Illinois - 689 N.E.2d 397 (Ill.App. 1 Dist. 1997), 1-96-2316, In re Brown
• Kentucky - 830 S.W.2d 877 (Ky. 1992), 91-SC-270, Jones v. Commonwealth