Practice Note (Barrister: Fees)

Afectaciones

CONSIDERA CASO

• Practice Direction (Barrister: Fees)

REPORTED OPINION OF por

• [1994] 1 All ER 96
• [1994] 1 WLR 74

CONSIDERADA por

• R v Cox (Francis)
• R v The Council of the Borough of Poole and Another
• R v Secretary of State for Transport ex parte Richmond upon Thames LBC (No.4)

[ver más]

• Derbyshire Dales DC and other v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and other
• Hill, Registrar of Lands v RBC Royal Bank of Canada
• Paradise Gardens Ltd v Ministry of Planning, Economic, Social Restructuring and Gender Affairs
• Cecile Hill, Registrar of Lands Claimant v RBC Royal Bank of Canada Defendants [ECSC]

REFUNDIDA por

• Practice Direction (Court of Appeal (Civil Division))

CITADA NEUTRALMENTE por

• R Mr X v General Medical Council

REFERIDA por

• Hatimuda Sdn Bhd v YB Menteri Tenaga Teknologi Hijau Dan Air and Another
• Dr Chandra Muzaffar v Universiti Malaya
• Darahman Ibrahim v Majlis Mesyuarat Kerajaan Negeri Perlis

[ver más]

• Majlis Perbandaran Pulau Pinang v Syarikat Bekerjasama-sama Serbaguna Sungai Gelugor Dengan Tanggungan