Port Line Ltd v Ben Line Steamers Ltd

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• Compensation (Defence) Act 1939 - Articles : S-4
• Compensation (Defence) Act 1939 - Articles : S-15

DISTINGUISHES

• Lord Strathcona Steamship Company Ltd v Dominion Coal Company Ltd

REFERS TO

• The Broadmayne
• William Tunstall v Jane Lloyd. Stephenson v Taylor
• 5 Mar. ant. 274. Dyer, 163. 12 E. 2. Stat. Ebor. 14 E. 3, cap. 1. Clerk de Assises, Verdicts, Certificates, Averment, Offices, Viscount. 2 Rol. Abr. 629. 2 Inst. 424. Ant. 99, 162. Post, 327, 332

CITES

• Attorney General v De Keyser's Royal Hotel
• Barker v Stickney

[See more]

• Bendall v McWhirter
• Chinese Mining and Engineering Company v Sale & Company
• Clore v Theatrical Properties and Westby & Company Ltd
• Davis Contractors Ltd v Fareham Urban District Council
• De Mattos v Gibson
• Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Company Ltd v Selfridge & Company Ltd
• London County Council v Allen
• Lumley v Gye
• Lumley v Wagner
• Manchester Trust v Furness, Withy & Company
• Metropolitan Water Board v Dick, Kerr & Company
• Sea and Land Securities Ltd v William Dickinson & Company Ltd
• Southern Foundries (1926) Ltd v Shirlaw
• Tamplin (F. A.) Steamship Company v Anglo-Mexican Petroleum Products Company
• Tulk v Moxhay
• Attorney General v De Keyser's Royal Hotel
• Manchester Trust v Furness, Withy & Company
• Southern Foundries (1926) Ltd v Shirlaw

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1958] 1 All ER 787
• [1958] 1 Lloyd's Rep 290
• [1958] 2 WLR 551

[See more]

• [1958] 2 QB 146

CITED in

• Hong Kong Fir Shipping Company Ltd v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd
• The "Leoborg"

REFERRED in

• Compania Colombiana de Seguros v Pacific Steam Navigation Company ; Empresa de Telefona de Bogota v Pacific Steam Navigation Company (Salaverry.)
• Ocean Tramp Tankers Corporation v V/O Sovfracht ; The Eugenia
• Manifest Shipping Company Ltd v Uni-Polaris Shipping Company Ltd (Star Sea)

[See more]

• The "Sam Hawk"
• National Carriers Ltd v Panalpina (Northern) Ltd
• Hong Kong Fir Shipping Company Ltd v Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd

DISTINGUISHED in

• Swiss Bank Corporation v Lloyds Bank Ltd

CONSIDERED in

• Manifest Shipping Company Ltd (Plaintiff/Respondents) v Uni-Polaris Shipping Company Ltd and Another

ADOPTED in

• Brisbane City Council v Group Projects Pty Ltd

This document cites

---

• Southern Foundries (1926) Ltd v Shirlaw
• Davis Contractors Ltd v Fareham Urban District Council
• Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Company Ltd v Selfridge & Company Ltd
• Bendall v McWhirter
• William Tunstall v Jane Lloyd. Stephenson v Taylor



See all quotations

• Manchester Trust v Furness, Withy & Company
• Tulk v Moxhay
• Barker v Stickney
• The Broadmayne
• Chinese Mining and Engineering Company v Sale & Company
• 5 Mar. ant. 274. Dyer, 163. 12 E. 2. Stat. Ebor. 14 E. 3, cap. 1. Clerk de Assises, Verdicts, Certificates, Averment, Offices, Viscount. 2 Rol. Abr. 629. 2 Inst. 424. Ant. 99, 162. Post, 327, 332
• Clore v Theatrical Properties and Westby & Company Ltd
• Metropolitan Water Board v Dick, Kerr & Company
• Attorney General v De Keyser's Royal Hotel
• Sea and Land Securities Ltd v William Dickinson & Company Ltd
• Lumley v Wagner
• De Mattos v Gibson
• Lumley v Gye
• Tamplin (F. A.) Steamship Company v Anglo-Mexican Petroleum Products Company
• Attorney General v De Keyser's Royal Hotel
• Lord Strathcona Steamship Company Ltd v Dominion Coal Company Ltd
• London County Council v Allen
• Manchester Trust v Furness, Withy & Company
• Southern Foundries (1926) Ltd v Shirlaw