Pohlne v Pfeiffer

Core Citations

DOES NOT FOLLOW

• Saxton v Saxton

REFERS TO

• Re Gibson. Mathews v Foulsham
• Re Whitby
• Re Slater. Slater v Slater

[See more]

• Re Bick. Edwards v Bush
• Arthur v Bokenham
• Re Russell. Russell v Chell
• Re Sikes. Moxon v Crossley
• Re Portal and Lamb

CONSIDERS

• Re Russell. Russell v Chell
• Re Edwards, decd.; MacAdam v Wright
• Re Evans. Evans v Powell

CITES

• Re Ord. Dickinson v Dickinson
• Re Willis. Spencer v Willis
• Re Horton. Lloyd v Hatchett

[See more]

• Re Bancroft. Bancroft v Bancroft
• Struthers v Struthers
• Drake v Martin
• Miles v Miles
• Cox v Bennett
• Templeton v Leviathan Pty Ltd
• Castle v Fox
• Hance v Truwhitt

FOLLOWS

• Re Nottage. Jones v Palmer (No. 2)

APPROVES

• Mcbride v Hudson

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 112 CLR 52
• [1964] ALR 1100

CONSIDERED in

• Serwin v Dolso
• NSW Trustee & Guardian v Reid

This document cites

• Re Ord. Dickinson v Dickinson
• Castle v Fox
• Re Slater. Slater v Slater
• Re Portal and Lamb
• Cox v Bennett



See all quotations

• Re Russell. Russell v Chell
• Hance v Truwhitt
• Re Gibson. Mathews v Foulsham
• Re Bancroft. Bancroft v Bancroft
• Templeton v Leviathan Pty Ltd
• Re Willis. Spencer v Willis
• Drake v Martin
• Saxton v Saxton
• Re Horton. Lloyd v Hatchett
• Mcbride v Hudson
• Re Edwards, decd.; MacAdam v Wright
• Struthers v Struthers
• Re Evans. Evans v Powell
• Re Sikes. Moxon v Crossley
• Re Bick. Edwards v Bush
• Re Whitby
• Arthur v Bokenham
• Re Nottage. Jones v Palmer (No. 2)
• Miles v Miles