A Plymouth, a parolee, and the police: the case for the exclusionary rule in civil forfeiture after Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole v. Scott.
›
Linked as:Extract
A Plymouth, a parolee, and the police: the case for the exclusionary rule in civil forfeiture after Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole v. Scott.
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
This document cites
- Federal Cases - 182 F.3d 643 (8th Cir. 1999), 98-2770, United States v $404,905.00 in United States Currency
- Federal Cases - 647 F.2d 580 (5th Cir. 1981), 80-7070, Jonas v. City of Atlanta
- Federal Cases - 711 F.2d 1297 (5th Cir. 1983), 82-1132, United States v. One 1978 Mercedes Benz, Four-Door Sedan, VIN: 116-036-12-004084
- Federal Cases - 477 F.Supp. 879 (E.D.Mich. 1979), Civ. A. 6-70031, United States v. One 1976 Cadillac Seville, VIN: 6S69R6Q459181
- Federal Cases - 130 F.3d 1154 (5th Cir. 1997), 96-11388, Wren v. Towe
