Plea bargaining and the substantive and procedural goals of criminal justice: from retribution and adversarialism to preventive justice and hybrid-inquisitorialism.

This document cites

• Federal Cases - 592 F.2d 931 (6th Cir. 1979), 78-5148, United States v. Hickman
• Federal Cases - 976 F.Supp.2d 417 (E.D.N.Y. 2013), 11-CR-345, United States v. Kupa
• Federal Cases - 501 U.S. 923 (1991), 90-615, Peretz v. United States
• Federal Cases - 513 U.S. 196 (1995), 93-1340, United States v. Mezzanatto
• Federal Cases - 518 U.S. 515 (1996), 94-1941, United States v. Virginia



See all quotations

• Federal Cases - 516 U.S. 29 (1995), 94-7427, Libretti v. United States
• Federal Cases - 541 U.S. 36 (2004), 02-9410, Crawford v. Washington
• Federal Cases - 542 U.S. 296 (2004), 02-1632, Blakely v. Washington
• Federal Cases - 566 U.S. 156 (2012), 10-209, Lafler v. Cooper
• Federal Cases - 378 U.S. 1 (1964), 110, Malloy v. Hogan
• Federal Cases - 400 U.S. 25 (1970), 14, North Carolina v. Alford
• Federal Cases - 406 U.S. 715 (1972), 70-5009, Jackson v. Indiana
• Federal Cases - 427 U.S. 307 (1976), 74-1044, Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia
• Federal Cases - 428 U.S. 262 (1976), 75-5394, Jurek v. Texas
• Federal Cases - 434 U.S. 357 (1978), 76-1334, Bordenkircher v. Hayes
• Federal Cases - 439 U.S. 212 (1978), 77-5903, Corbitt v. New Jersey