Playing with post-Booker fire: the dangers of increased judicial discretion in federal white collar sentencing.

This document cites

• Federal Cases - 397 F.3d 103 (2nd Cir. 2005), 03-1675, United States v. Crosby
• Federal Cases - 433 F.3d 273 (2nd Cir. 2006), 04-3953, United States v. Stewart
• Federal Cases - 874 F.2d 1441 (11th Cir. 1989), 88-5319, United States v. Torkington
• Federal Cases - 403 F.3d 997 (8th Cir. 2005), 04-1594, United States v. Haack
• Federal Cases - 429 F.3d 1192 (8th Cir. 2005), 04-1944, United States v. Coyle



See all quotations

• Federal Cases - 455 F.3d 1227 (11th Cir. 2006), 05-16645, United States v. Martin
• Federal Cases - 308 F.Supp.2d 1253 (N.D.Ala. 2004), CV-03-BE-1139, In re HealthSouth Corp.
• Federal Cases - 355 F.Supp.2d 1269 (D.Utah 2005), 203-CR-00882, United States v. Wilson
• Federal Cases - 488 U.S. 361 (1989), 87-7028, Mistretta v. United States
• Federal Cases - 518 U.S. 81 (1996), 94-1664, Koon v. United States
• Federal Cases - 530 U.S. 466 (2000), 99-478, Apprendi v. New Jersey
• Federal Cases - 542 U.S. 296 (2004), 02-1632, Blakely v. Washington
• Federal Cases - 543 U.S. 220 (2005), 04-104, United States v. Booker