Pipe v The Commissioners for H M HM Revenue and Customs
Linked as:
Extract
Pipe v The Commissioners for H M HM Revenue and Customs
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
REFERS TO
- Austin v Price (Inspector of Taxes)
- King v United Kingdom (13881/02)
- Ramsay (W T) Ltd v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
[See more]
CITES
- Craven (HM Inspector of Taxes) v White; Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Bowater Property Developments Ltd; Baylis (HM Inspector of Taxes) v Gregory
- Sharkey v HM Revenue and Customs; Sharkey v De Croos (Inspector of Taxes)
CONSIDERS
- Fleming v London Produce Company Ltd
- Sharkey v HM Revenue and Customs; Sharkey v De Croos (Inspector of Taxes)
- Craven (HM Inspector of Taxes) v White; Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Bowater Property Developments Ltd; Baylis (HM Inspector of Taxes) v Gregory
[See more]
REPORTED OPINION OF in
CITED in
- TC03494: Wong Yau Lam and another
- Gold Nuts Ltd and Others v The Commissioners for HM Revenue & Customs
CONSIDERED in
- Donaldson v Revenue and Customs Commissioners
- R (oao William Archer) v The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs
REFERRED in
This document cites
- Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos y de las Libertades Fundamentales
- Sharkey v HM Revenue and Customs; Sharkey v De Croos (Inspector of Taxes)
- Ramsay (W T) Ltd v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
- Craven (HM Inspector of Taxes) v White; Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Bowater Property Developments Ltd; Baylis (HM Inspector of Taxes) v Gregory
- Yau and Others v Customs & Excise
