Philips v Ward
Linked as:
Extract
Philips v Ward
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
REFERS TO
- Murphy v Wexford County Council
- Moss v Christchurch Rural Council; Rogers v Christchurch Rural Council
- British Westinghouse Electric and Manufacturing Company Ltd v Underground Electric Railways Company of London Ltd
[See more]
DISTINGUISHES
CLARIFIED in
REFERRED in
- Secretary of State for the Environment v Essex Goodman & Suggitt
- Hipkins v Jack Cotton Partnership
- Cross and Another v David Martin & Mortimer
[See more]
APPLIED in
- Secretary of State for the Environment v Essex Goodman & Suggitt
- Gardner and Another v Marsh and Parsons (A Firm) and Another
- Patel and Another v Hooper & Jackson (A Firm)
[See more]
CONSIDERED in
- Alan Terence Shaw & Jennifer Ann Shaw (Plaintiffs) v Halifax (South West) Ltd (trading as Hartnell Taylor Cook Residential)
- Mary Elizabeth Berry v Newport Borough Council
- (1)Takorbhai Patel (Claimants) (2)Devyanai Patel and Another (Defendant/Part 20 Claimant) John Barry Shaw (Part 20 Defendant)
[See more]
CITED in
- Nalania Pty Ltd v Lonori Pty Ltd
- Brown v Kmr Services Ltd Sword Daniels v Pitel and Others
- Banque Bruxelles Lambert SA v Eagle Star Insurance Company Ltd
[See more]
FOLLOWED in
REPORTED OPINION OF in
NOT FOLLOWED in
DISTINGUISHED in
This document cites
