Perry v Clissold

Core Citations

REFERS TO

• Cholmondeley (Marquis) v Lord Clinton
• Ex parte Winder

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• 1 CLR 363

CITED in

• PIPE Networks Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Superannuation Corporation
• Jango v Northern Territory
• Yirra Pty Ltd (T/as Richmond Demolition and Salvage) v Summerton

[See more]

• Lehman Brothers Asia Holdings Ltd (in Liquidation) v City of Swan

CONSIDERED in

• Sween v Connor
• Gordon v Crowley et Al
• Re Lightbourne, Edith

[See more]

• Incorporated Trustees of the Seventh Day Adventist Church v Jordan
• Grant (Thelma) by Attorney Dotlyn White v Beatrice Barnes
• Panton (Lasceta Buckley) v Lindsay (Carlton)
• Tabcorp Holdings Ltd v Victoria
• Gordon v Crowley et Al
• Browne v Quashie and RBTT Bank Caribbean Ltd
• White v Betalli
• Walker Corporation Pty Ltd v Director-General, Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water
• Salaroo and Mohammed v Brathwaite
• Leslie v Davis et Al; Davis v Leslie
• Mandurah Enterprises Pty Ltd v Western Australian Planning Commission
• Griffiths v Minister for Lands, Planning and Environment
• Dillon v Gosford City Council
• Roland Leslie Applicant v Bradley Davis Lex Clayton Davis Doreen Leslie Respondents [ECSC]
• The Incorporated Trustess of the Seventh day Adventist Church Applicant v Delores Jordan Respondent [ECSC]
• Elroy Arthur v T Michael Findlay
• Jennifer Sween a.k.a Jennifer Harper acting by her Attorney on record Cynthia Sween. Claimant v Nichola Connor Defendant [ECSC]
• Willmott Growers Group Inc. v Willmott Forests Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed) ((in Liquidation))
• Lawson v Minister for Environment and Water
• The Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Fysh
• R & R Fazzolari Pty Ltd v Parramatta City Council
• Duke v Lindow
• Thomas Gellizeau Applicant v Filius Ackie Respondent David Ackie Interested Party [ECSC]
• Gellizeau v Ackie et Al
• The Catholic Archdiocese of Melbourne v RWQ (a pseudonym)
• Hinds v Frederick
• Nicholls v Chen et Al
• Dessuit et Al v Farrington
• Webster v Alfonzo
• Hammond v Darby et Al
• Prasad v Griffith
• Pantin v Bellamy et Al
• Beckford v Cumper
• Porte v Smith; Walrond, Claimant
• The Mayor, Alderman and Citizens of the City of Port of Spain v Kerry et Al
• Bicar et Al v Catherine
• Western Australian Planning Commission v Temwood Holdings Pty Ltd
• Burton v Elvin
• Arthur v Findlay
• Momcilovic v The Queen
• Pooran v Roop

APPEAL RESOLVED in

• Perry v Clissold

AFFIRMED in

• Perry v Clissold

This document cites

• Cholmondeley (Marquis) v Lord Clinton
• Ex parte Winder