Pearson v Chen Chien Wen Edwin

Core Citations

DISTINGUISHES

• R v Bloomsbury and Marylebone County Court, ex parte Villerwest Ltd
• Al-Kandari v JR Brown & Company
• R v Bloomsbury and Marylebone County Court, ex parte Villerwest Ltd

FOLLOWS

• Austin Reed Ltd v Royal Insurance Company Ltd (No 2)
• Austin Reed Ltd v Royal Insurance Company Ltd, Re 20 Exchange St., Manchester

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1991] SGHC 31
• [1991] SLR 578

CITED in

• Lioncity Construction Company Pte Ltd v JFC Builders Pte Ltd

DISTINGUISHED in

• Tan Soo Giem v Yeo Ching Chua

APPEAL RESOLVED in

• Pearson v Chen Chien Wen Edwin

AFFIRMED in

• Pearson v Chen Chien Wen Edwin

FOLLOWED in

• Vettath v Vettath
• Anwar Siraj and Another v Ting Kang Chung John

REFERRED in

• Lee Hong Choon v Ng Cheo Hwee
• Lim Kok Koon v Tan JinHwee Eunice and Lim ChooEng (a firm)
• Tjo Kwe In v Chia Song Kwan

This document cites

• R v Bloomsbury and Marylebone County Court, ex parte Villerwest Ltd
• Al-Kandari v JR Brown & Company
• Austin Reed Ltd v Royal Insurance Company Ltd (No 2)
• R v Bloomsbury and Marylebone County Court, ex parte Villerwest Ltd
• Lee Lee Cheng v Seow Peng Kwang



See all quotations

• Austin Reed Ltd v Royal Insurance Company Ltd, Re 20 Exchange St., Manchester
• Austin Reed Ltd v Royal Insurance Company Ltd, Re 20 Exchange St., Manchester
• Supreme Court of Judicature Act