Payne v Payne

Core Citations

---

FOLLOWS

• J v J

APPROVES

• Ette v Ette

DISTINGUISHES

• Foster v Foster

CONSIDERS

• Matrimonial Causes Act 1965 - Articles : S-31

CONSIDERED in

• Hannellre Susanne Kate Forbes (Petitioner Respondent) v Duncan Edwin Fenfold Forbes (Respondent Appellant)
• Garner v Garner
• Baker v Baker

[See more]

• D.J v S.A
• Tania Ann Davies Petitioner v Brynley L'Anson Davies Respondent
• Hanley v Hanley
• Henry v Henry
• Joanne Balcombe Nee Dabreo v Allison Balcombe
• Vanterpool v Vanterpool
• Rp v Dp
• Mac v Dgc
• Mac v Dgc
• Chase v Chase
• E v E
• Spooner v Spooner
• Suzette Davis v Allan Davis
• Hughes v Hughes
• Murrell v Murrell
• Lucine Steadroy Hanley Petitioner v Yvonne Elizabeth Hanley Respondent [ECSC]
• D.J et Al v S.A.
• Joanne Balcombe Nee Dabreo of Georgetown v Allison Balcombe of Georgetown
• Dora Scatliffe v Irvine Fletcher Scatliffe [Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court]
• Raymer v Lovell

APPLIED in

• Re L (Relocation: Shared Residence)

DISTINGUISHED in

• Wales v Wadham

REFERRED in

• Re H (Children) (Residence Order: Condition)
• Laugee v Laugee
• Mauricio Handler-Ruiz v Michelle Diane Haydon

[See more]

• Thomasine Spooner Petitioner v Joseph Spooner Respondent [ECSC]
• Dora Scatliffe Petitioner v Irvine Fletcher Scatliffe Respondent
• Findlay v Findlay

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1968] 1 All ER 1113
• [1968] 1 WLR 390

CITED in

• Hughes v Hughes
• Chase v Chase
• Rego v Rego

[See more]

• Margaret Price Findlay Petitioner v Donald Findlay Respondent
• Raymond Dickenson Petitioner/Respondent v Esther Tonge-Dickenson Respondent/Applicant [ECSC]
• Peter Bird Petitioner v Angelina Evageline Piper Respondent [ECSC]
• Anita Ferguson Petitioner v David Ferguson Respondent [ECSC]

This document cites

---

• Foster v Foster
• J v J
• Ette v Ette