Payne v Payne

Core Citations

---

FOLLOWS

• J v J

APPROVES

• Ette v Ette

DISTINGUISHES

• Foster v Foster

CONSIDERS

• Matrimonial Causes Act 1965 - Articles : S-31

CONSIDERED in

• Hannellre Susanne Kate Forbes (Petitioner Respondent) v Duncan Edwin Fenfold Forbes (Respondent Appellant)
• Vanterpool v Vanterpool
• Rp v Dp

[See more]

• Spooner v Spooner
• Hanley v Hanley
• Joanne Balcombe Nee Dabreo v Allison Balcombe
• Joanne Balcombe Nee Dabreo of Georgetown v Allison Balcombe of Georgetown
• Lucine Steadroy Hanley Petitioner v Yvonne Elizabeth Hanley Respondent [ECSC]
• Tania Ann Davies Petitioner v Brynley L'Anson Davies Respondent
• Garner v Garner
• Dora Scatliffe v Irvine Fletcher Scatliffe [Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court]
• Suzette Davis v Allan Davis
• Murrell v Murrell
• Chase v Chase
• E v E
• Hughes v Hughes
• Raymer v Lovell
• Henry v Henry
• Baker v Baker
• Mac v Dgc
• D.J et Al v S.A.
• D.J v S.A
• Mac v Dgc

CITED in

• Hughes v Hughes
• Chase v Chase
• Peter Bird Petitioner v Angelina Evageline Piper Respondent [ECSC]

[See more]

• Raymond Dickenson Petitioner/Respondent v Esther Tonge-Dickenson Respondent/Applicant [ECSC]
• Anita Ferguson Petitioner v David Ferguson Respondent [ECSC]
• Margaret Price Findlay Petitioner v Donald Findlay Respondent
• Rego v Rego

REFERRED in

• Mauricio Handler-Ruiz v Michelle Diane Haydon
• Dora Scatliffe Petitioner v Irvine Fletcher Scatliffe Respondent
• Findlay v Findlay

[See more]

• Thomasine Spooner Petitioner v Joseph Spooner Respondent [ECSC]
• Re H (Children) (Residence Order: Condition)
• Laugee v Laugee

APPLIED in

• Re L (Relocation: Shared Residence)

DISTINGUISHED in

• Wales v Wadham

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1968] 1 All ER 1113
• [1968] 1 WLR 390

This document cites

---

• Foster v Foster
• J v J
• Ette v Ette