Pauline Siew Phin Chai v Tan Sri Khoo Kay Peng

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Spiliada Maritime Corporation v Cansulex Ltd
• De Dampierre v de Dampierre
• Domicile and Matrimonial Proceedings Act 1973 - Articles : S-5

[See more]

• Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 - Articles : S-33
• Domicile and Matrimonial Proceedings Act 1973 - Articles : SCH-1

CONSIDERS

• Henderson v Henderson. [HIGH COURT of CHANCERY]
• New Brunswick Rail Company v British & French Trust Corporation Ltd

CITES

• New Brunswick Rail Company v British & French Trust Corporation Ltd
• Barratt v Ansell (t/a as Woolf Seddon); Arthur JS Hall & Company v Simons
• Hunter and Others v Chief Constable of West Midlands

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2015] 2 FLR 412

CITED in

• Tania Ann Davies Petitioner v Brynley L'Anson Davies Respondent

CONSIDERED in

• Pauline Siew Phin Chai (Petitioner) v Tan Sri Khoo Kay Peng

This document cites

• Barratt v Ansell (t/a as Woolf Seddon); Arthur JS Hall & Company v Simons
• De Dampierre v de Dampierre
• Henderson v Henderson. [HIGH COURT of CHANCERY]
• New Brunswick Rail Company v British & French Trust Corporation Ltd
• Hunter and Others v Chief Constable of West Midlands



See all quotations

• New Brunswick Rail Company v British & French Trust Corporation Ltd
• Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982
• Domicile and Matrimonial Proceedings Act 1973
• Spiliada Maritime Corporation v Cansulex Ltd