Paton v British Pregnancy Advisory Service Trustees

Core Citations

---

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Paton v British Pregnancy Advisory Service Trustees

CONSIDERS

• Abortion Act 1967 - Articles : S-1

REFERS TO

• Gouriet v Union of Post Office Workers
• Montgomery v Montgomery
• R v Smith (John)

[See more]

• North London Railway Company v Great Northern Railway Company
• Elliot v Lord Joicey
• Forster v Forster

CITED in

• C and Another v S and Others
• C and Another v S and Others
• Yunghanns v Candoora No 19 Pty Ltd

[See more]

• Re Mb
• The Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission’s Application
• Rotherham and Doncaster and South Humber NHS Foundation Trust v NR (by her litigation friend, the Official Solicitor)
• Heidi Crowter v The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
• Heidi Crowter v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
• Royal College of Nursing of the United Kingdom v Department of Health and Social Security
• St. George's Healthcare N.H.S. Trust v S

REFERRED in

• B v Islington Health Authority
• DM
• Seah Heng Lye; Tarn Ley Chian

[See more]

• Veelavan Govindasamy v Dr Haris Hamzah
• Khor Liang Keow v Tee Ming Kook
• Foo Yet Chine v Leong Meng Kuan
• Re M B (Caesarian section)
• Re AB (Termination of Pregnancy)
• Guys and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GSTT) v R
• Attorney General (S.P.U.C.) v Open Door Counselling Ltd
• Re A (Children) (Conjoined Twins: Surgical Separation)
• C v S and Another
• Rance v Mid-Downs Health Authority and Another

APPLIED in

• Re F. (in Utero)

FOLLOWED in

• Chin Yoke Teng v William Ui Yee Mein
• Khor Liang Keow v Tee Ming Kook

CONSIDERED in

• Re Mb
• B v Islington Health Authority
• Rotherham and Doncaster and South Humber NHS Foundation Trust v NR (by her litigation friend, the Official Solicitor)

[See more]

• Harrild v Director of Proceedings

NOT APPLIED in

• Berkshire County Council v D-P

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1978] 2 All ER 987
• [1978] 3 WLR 687
• [1979] QB 276

DISTINGUISHED in

• Evans v Amicus Healthcare Ltd and Others (Secretary of State for Health Intervening); Hadley v Midland Fertility Services Ltd and Others