Parinv (Hatfield) Ltd v Commissioners of Inland Revenue

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Stamp Act 1891
• Re Brown Root McDermott Fabricators Ltd and Another's Application
• WM Cory & Son Ltd v Commissioners of Inland Revenue

[See more]

• Marx v Estates and General Investments Ltd
• Maynard v Consolidated Kent Collieries Corporation

DOES NOT FOLLOW

• Re English, Scottish, and Australian Chartered Bank

REFERS TO

• Henty and Constable (Brewers) Ltd v Commissioners of Inland Revenue

CITES

• Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Maple & Company (Paris) Ltd
• Oughtred v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
• R v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, ex parte Evill

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1996] BTC 8062
• [1996] STC 933

APPEAL RESOLVED in

• Parinv (Hatfield) Ltd v Commissioners of Inland Revenue

AFFIRMED in

• Parinv (Hatfield) Ltd v Commissioners of Inland Revenue

CONSIDERED in

• McGuane v Welch

This document cites

• WM Cory & Son Ltd v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
• Henty and Constable (Brewers) Ltd v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
• Oughtred v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
• Henty and Constable (Brewers) Ltd v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
• Re English, Scottish, and Australian Chartered Bank



See all quotations

• Re Alabama, New Orleans, Texas and Pacific Junction Railway Company
• Marx v Estates and General Investments Ltd
• R v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, ex parte Evill
• Re Brown Root McDermott Fabricators Ltd and Another's Application
• Maynard v Consolidated Kent Collieries Corporation
• Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Maple & Company (Paris) Ltd
• Stamp Act 1891