Pankina v Secretary of State for the Home Department

Core Citations

---

CONSIDERS

• R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (No 2)
• British Oxygen Company Ltd v Board of Trade
• R (Bancoult) v Foreign Secretary (No 2)

CONSIDERS

• Immigration Appeals Act 1969
• Immigration Act 1971
• Odelola v Secretary of State for the Home Department

[See more]

• Immigration Act 1971 - Articles : S-3
• Human Rights Act 1998 - Articles : SCH-1
• Immigration Appeals Act 1969 - Articles : S-8
• Immigration Appeals Act 1969 - Articles : S-24
• Immigration Act 1971 - Articles : S-1
• Immigration Act 1971 - Articles : S-33
• Immigration Act 1971 - Articles : SCH-3
• Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 - Articles : S-84
• Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 - Articles : S-85
• Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 - Articles : S-86
• Aliens Order, 1953
• Human Rights Act 1998 - Articles : S-6

REFERS TO

• R v Secretary of State for Social Security, ex parte Sutherland
• R v Secretary of State for Education and Employment, ex parte Begbie
• British Oxygen Company Ltd v Board of Trade

[See more]

• R v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board, ex parte Lain

APPLIES

• R v Secretary of State for Home Affairs, ex parte Hosenball
• The Zamora
• Case of Proclamations

CITES

• R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (No 2)

DISTINGUISHES

• R v Secretary of State for Social Services, ex parte Camden London Borough Council

REFERRED in

• UR and Others (Policy; Executive Discretion; Remittal) Nepal
• R Cooke v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Arslan v Secretary of state for the Home Department

[See more]

• R (Mirza and Others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Re Qureshi (Tier 4: Effect of Variation: Appendix C: Pakistan)
• R Sandip Narpatsinh Sayaniya v Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Secretary of State for the Home Department (Interested Party)
• MF (Article 8 - New Rules) Nigeria [Upper Tribunal]
• Ramesh Sapkota and another v Secretary of State for The Home Department
• LLD, by her mother and next friend v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Secretary of State for the Home Department v Muhammad Amjid Khan
• Majumder and Qadir v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Secretary of State for the Home Department and Another v Kizhar Hayat (Pakistan) and Another
• G v G
• Min for Justice v O'Connor
• Poloko Hiri v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• The Queen (on the application of New London College Ltd) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Balchand v Minister for Justice and Equality

CONSIDERED in

• Aleem (Pankina - Uplift for overseas earnings)
• Bhanushali (re-using same CAS: new rules)
• KG (Gurkhas– overage dependants – policy)

[See more]

• R Fayyaz Qureshi v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• DP (United States of America) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Legacy Cases Forum v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Treebhowan v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R CNM (the College of Naturopathic Medicine) Ltd v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Ullah v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• PS (India) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Dhami v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• The Queen (on The Application of English Speaking Board (International) Ltd) v Secretary of State for The Home Department
• AA (Kenya) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (SYED) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: Harshadbhai Gordhanbhai Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Joint Council for The Welfare of Immigrants (R) v Secretary of State for The Home Department
• R (Dhugana) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Adubiri-Gyimah and Others (Post-study work – Listed institution)
• R Puriza v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Joanna Grant v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Feroz v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Rajbhandari (PBS: funds “available”)
• MM and SA (Pankina: Near-Miss) Pakistan
• Ejifugha (Tier 4 – funds – credit)
• R Sinia Benis Castro v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Jalal Hussain v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Kamran (UK NARIC – incorporation in rules)
• Chau Le (Immigration Rules - de minimis principle)
• R (Adeyemi-Doro and Another) v Secretary of State for The Home
• Argu Miah v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Agubata v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Abdul Wahid Nasire v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (English UK) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Owolabi (Tier 2 – skilled occupations)
• R Syed v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R New London College Ltd v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Fu) v Secretary of State for Home Department
• Molla (established presence – date of application)
• R Ajayi (Claimant) First Tier Tribunal (Defendant) Secretary of State and Another (Interested Party)
• Tse-Shan-Wu v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• SAB and Others (students - serious breach of conditions - Article 8)
• Nasim and Others (Raju: reasons not to follow?)
• R (Alvi) v Secretary of State for Home Department
• Iheanyi Agubata (Nigeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Uk Business Academy v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• FA and AA (PBS effect of Pankina) Nigeria
• Gavin Blundell v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
• Ferrer (Ltd appeal grounds; Alvi)
• R Mayaya v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• AH (Pakistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Shahzad (Art 8: Legitimate Aim) [Asylum and Immigration Tribunal]
• Kaur (Entry Clearance – date of application)
• Pun and Others (Gurkhas—Policy—Article 8) Nepal
• HM and Others (PBS – legitimate expectation – paragraph 245ZX(I) Malawi
• Hiwa Hakemi and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R and Others v Secretary of State for The Home Department and Another
• Oluwasegun Olalekan Oke For Judicial Review Of A Decision By The Upper Tribunal
• R (Ngouh) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Patel and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [Sup Ct]
• CDS (PBS "available" Article 8) Brazil; CDS v Secretary of State for Home Department
• Raju and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Satyanand Maharaj
• Aa (Sri Lanka) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Dennis Meadows and Others v Attorney General of Jamaica and Others
• R (on the Application of Alvi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [Sup Ct]
• Nabeel Ahsan v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• The Queen (on the application of Zahid Hafeez) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• MM (Lebanon) and Others v The Secretary of State for the Home Department Master AF (Interested Party) Sheffield Asian Community Action Group (Intervener)

CITED in

• R SA v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R West London Vocational Training College Ltd v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• AA (Nigeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

[See more]

• As (India) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Global Vision College Ltd v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Ylian Rushiti and Adriatik Laci v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• The Secretary of State for the Home Department v KG (India)
• R St Mary Magdalene Academy v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Luximon v Minister for Justice & EqualityBachand v Minister for Justice & Equality
• Dominic Suraj and 4 others v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
• London Borough of Tower Hamlets v R X

APPLIED in

• R School of Business and Commerce Ltd v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Abdullah Bashir Ahmed v Secretary of State for The Home Department
• Tr (Ccol Cases) Pakista

COMMENTED in

• MB (Article 8-Near Miss) Pakistan

RELIED UPON in

• AQ (Pakistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

NOT FOLLOWED in

• Miah and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department (No 1)
• The Queen (on the application of New London College Ltd) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2011] 1 All ER 1043
• [2010] All ER D 196 Jun
• [2010] INLR 529

[See more]

• [2010] ACD 93
• [2010] WLR D 158
• [2010] Imm AR 689
• [2010] 3 WLR 1526
• [2011] QB 376

This document cites

---

• Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos y de las Libertades Fundamentales
• R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (No 2)
• R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (No 2)
• British Oxygen Company Ltd v Board of Trade
• R v Secretary of State for Education and Employment, ex parte Begbie



See all quotations

• British Oxygen Company Ltd v Board of Trade
• R v Secretary of State for Home Affairs, ex parte Hosenball
• R v Secretary of State for Social Services, ex parte Camden London Borough Council
• Odelola v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Proclamations
• R v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board, ex parte Lain
• The Zamora
• R v Secretary of State for Social Security, ex parte Sutherland
• Case of Proclamations
• Immigration Appeals Act 1969
• Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002
• Immigration Act 1971
• R (Bancoult) v Foreign Secretary (No 2)
• Human Rights Act 1998