Paddock v. Tuscola & Saginaw Bay Ry. Co., Inc., Docket No. 192854

Core Citations

ABROGATES OTHER CASE

• Cryderman v. Soo Line R. Co.

APPEAL RESOLVED in

• Paddock v. Tuscola and Saginaw Bay Railway Co., Inc.

REEMPLAZADA POR in

• Paddock v. Tuscola and Saginaw Bay Railway Co., Inc.

This document cites

• Michigan - Harrison v. Grand Trunk Western R. Co.
• Federal Cases - Armstrong v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, Civ. A. No. W-93-CA-055.
• Federal Cases - Kesslering v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.
• Michigan - Turner v. CSX Transp., Inc., Docket Nos. 138138
• Michigan - Hagerman v. Gencorp Automotive



See all quotations

• Michigan - Baughman v. Consolidated Rail Corp., Docket No. 113816
• Michigan - Reese v. County of Wayne
• Michigan - Pick v. Szymczak, Docket No. 98142
• Federal Cases - Csx Transportation, Inc v. Easterwood Easterwood v. Csx Transportation, Inc
• Michigan - Taylor v. Lenawee County Bd. of Road Com'rs
• Federal Cases - WRIGHT BY AND THROUGH WRIGHT v. Illinois Central R. Co.
• Federal Cases - Bowman v. Norfolk Southern Ry. Co.
• US - Reference Stubs - Repairing and maintaining highways; damages for bodily injury or damage to property; liability, procedure, and remedy as to county roads; judgment against state; payment of judgment; liability of municipal corporation; effect of contractual undertaking to perform work on state trunk line highway; limitations on duties of governmental agency; limitation
• US - Reference Stubs - Clear vision areas; expenditure of funds relating to high speed rail corridor