Shoe Branding Europe BVBA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).

Core Citations

WORK EXPRESSION OF

• Shoe Branding Europe BVBA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).

This document cites

• Herhof-Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Ferrero Deutschland GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Henkel KgaA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Longevity Health Products Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) v Shaker di L. Laudato & C. Sas.



See all quotations

• Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) and Orange A/S.
• L & D SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Estée Lauder Cosmetics GmbH & Co. OHG contra Lancaster Group GmbH.
• nfon AG v Fon Wireless Ltd and Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Big Line Sas di Graziani Lorenzo v Demon International LC.
• Gut Springenheide GmbH y Rudolf Tusky contra Oberkreisdirektor des Kreises Steinfurt - Amt für Lebensmittelüberwachung.
• Metropolis Inmobiliarias y Restauraciones SL v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Lloyd Schuhfabrik Meyer & Co. GmbH contra Klijsen Handel BV.
• Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (codified version) (Text with EEA relevance)
• Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark