Mundipharma GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

Afectaciones

WORK EXPRESSION OF por

• Mundipharma GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

Documentos citados

• Ferrero Deutschland GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Aceites del Sur-Coosur SA v Koipe Corporación SL and Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc., formerly Pathe Communications Corporation.
• Cooperativa Vitivinícola Arousana, S. Coop. Galega v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) v Shaker di L. Laudato & C. Sas.



Ver todas las citas

• Waterford Wedgwood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd and Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Krafft SA v Vitakraft-Werke Wührmann & Sohn GmbH & Co. KG.
• Karen Goncharov v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) v Celltech R&D Ltd.
• medi GmbH & Co. KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Metropolis Inmobiliarias y Restauraciones SL v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Media-Saturn-Holding GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
• Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (codified version) (Text with EEA relevance)
• Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark