Optus v Leighton and Others

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Hussey v Eels
• The World Beauty ; Andros Springs (Owners) v World Beauty (Owners)
• British Westinghouse Electric and Manufacturing Company Ltd v Underground Electric Railways Company of London Ltd

[See more]

• Caparo Industries Plc v Dickman
• The Gazelle
• Chaplin v Hicks
• Carslogie Steamship Company Ltd v Royal Norwegian Government Represented by the Norwegian Shipping and Trade Mission
• Monroe Schneider Associates (Inc.) v No 1 Raberem Pty Ltd
• Roper v Johnson
• McMullin v ICI Australia
• Joyner v Weeks
• Fisher v C.H.T. Ltd (No. 2)
• The Munster
• East Ham Corporation v Bernard Sunley & Sons Ltd
• Harbutt's ‘Plasticine’Harbutt's Ltd v Wayne Tank and Pump Company Ltd
• 2 Dunl 6
• Shearman v Folland
• Lawrence v Boswell
• United Australia Ltd v Barclays Bank Ltd
• Tepko Pty Ltd v Water Board
• Stapley v Gypsum Mines Ltd
• Erie County Natural Gas and Fuel Company v Carroll
• Smith v Littlewoods Organisation Ltd; Maloco v Littlewoods Organisation Ltd
• Liesbosch Dredger (Owners of) v Owners of SS Edison (The Liesbosch)
• Hodge v Cowling (Clifford) & Company
• Hedley Byrne & Company Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd
• The "Rajasthan"-(Brockenbridge, Master)
• Taylor v Rover Company Ltd
• Darbishire v Warran
• O'Grady v Westminster Scaffolding Ltd
• Hollis v Vabu Pty Ltd
• Hyder Consulting (Australia) P/L v Wilh Wilhelmsen Agency P/L and Another
• Nance v British Columbia Electric Rly. Company Ltd
• Bacon v Cooper (Metals) Ltd
• The Haversham Grange
• Finlay (James) & Company Ltd v N. v Kwik Hoo Tong Handel Maatschappij
• Pacific Associates Inc. v Baxter
• British Transport Commission v Gourley
• Lavarack v Woods of Colchester Ltd

CONSIDERS

• Shops Act 1912

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2002] NSWSC 327

CONSIDERED in

• Roberts v Rodier
• Lovric and Another v WorkCover Authority of New South Wales and Others
• Ming Tian Real Property Pty Ltd

This document cites

• R. v. Shubley, (1990) 104 N.R. 81 (SCC)
• Harbutt's ‘Plasticine’Harbutt's Ltd v Wayne Tank and Pump Company Ltd
• Modbury Triangle Shopping Centre Pty Ltd v Anzil
• British Transport Commission v Gourley
• Hedley Byrne & Company Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd



See all quotations

• Tepko Pty Ltd v Water Board
• The World Beauty ; Andros Springs (Owners) v World Beauty (Owners)
• Fisher v C.H.T. Ltd (No. 2)
• United Australia Ltd v Barclays Bank Ltd
• Carslogie Steamship Company Ltd v Royal Norwegian Government Represented by the Norwegian Shipping and Trade Mission
• British Westinghouse Electric and Manufacturing Company Ltd v Underground Electric Railways Company of London Ltd
• Performance Cars Ltd (Plaintiffs v Harold James Abraham (Defendant
• Liesbosch Dredger (Owners of) v Owners of SS Edison (The Liesbosch)
• Stapley v Gypsum Mines Ltd
• Hyder Consulting (Australia) P/L v Wilh Wilhelmsen Agency P/L and Another
• Hussey v Eels
• Hollis v Vabu Pty Ltd
• Pacific Associates Inc. v Baxter
• East Ham Corporation v Bernard Sunley & Sons Ltd
• Lavarack v Woods of Colchester Ltd
• Smith v Littlewoods Organisation Ltd; Maloco v Littlewoods Organisation Ltd
• Darbishire v Warran
• Livingstone v Rawyards Coal Company
• Chaplin v Hicks
• The Haversham Grange
• United Australia Ltd v Barclays Bank Ltd
• Monroe Schneider Associates (Inc.) v No 1 Raberem Pty Ltd
• The Pactolus
• Hodge v Cowling (Clifford) & Company
• Simonius Vischer & Company v Holt & Thompson
• Perkins and Another, Assignees of Hughes v Smith
• R v Lediard
• Joyner v Weeks
• Nance v British Columbia Electric Rly. Company Ltd
• 2 Dunl 6