Optimal standardization in the law of property: The numerus clausus principle.

This document cites

• Federal Cases - 35 F.2d 279 (2nd Cir. 1929), 89, Cheney Bros. v. Doris Silk Corporation
• Federal Cases - 153 F. 24 (6th Cir. 1907), 1,581, John D. Park & Sons Co. v. Hartman
• Federal Cases - 119 F. 294 (7th Cir. 1902), 789., National Telegraph News Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
• Federal Cases - 191 F.2d 739 (8th Cir. 1951), 14388, National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. Kalis
• Federal Cases - 428 F.2d 1071 (D.C. Cir. 1970), 22405, Javins v. First Nat. Realty Corp.



See all quotations

• Federal Cases - 456 U.S. 556 (1982), 80-1765, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Inc. v Hydrolevel Corp.
• Federal Cases - 467 U.S. 229 (1984), 83-141, Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff
• Federal Cases - 486 U.S. 492 (1988), 87-157, Allied Tube & Conduit Corp. v. Indian Head, Inc.
• Federal Cases - 489 U.S. 141 (1989), 87-1346, Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.
• Federal Cases - 509 U.S. 86 (1993), 91-794, Harper v. Virginia Dept. of Taxation
• Federal Cases - 513 U.S. 106 (1994), 93-908, Reich v. Collins
• Federal Cases - 529 U.S. 89 (2000), 98-1701, United States v. Locke
• Federal Cases - 220 U.S. 373 (1911), 72, Dr. Miles Medical Company v. John D. Park & Sons Company
• Federal Cases - 31 U.S. 68 (1832), Smith v. Bell
• Federal Cases - 248 U.S. 215 (1918), 221, International News Service v. Associated Press
• Federal Cases - 364 U.S. 656 (1961), 73, Radiant Burners, Inc. v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co.,
• Federal Cases - 376 U.S. 234 (1964), 106, Compco Corporation v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc.
• Federal Cases - 376 U.S. 225 (1964), 108, Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.
• Federal Cases - 412 U.S. 546 (1973), 71-1192, Goldstein v. California
• California - 12 Cal.App. 350, Civ. 740, Hannon v. Southern Pacific Railroad Co.
• Illinois - 456 N.E.2d 84 (Ill. 1983), 57145, Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. Dow Jones & Co., Inc.
• Illinois - 53 N.E.2d 22 (Ill.App. 1 Dist. 1944), 42756, Stanmeyer v. Davis
• Massachusetts - 140 Mass. 188 (Mass. 1885), Norcross v. James
• Massachusetts - 159 Mass. 428 (1893), Douglas v. Stetson
• Kentucky - 98 S.W.2d 918 (Ky.App. 1936), Sumner v. Borders
• Minnesota - 119 N.W. 797 (Minn. 1909), 15,939, Thompson v. Baxter
• Missouri - 468 S.W.2d 193 (Mo. 1971), 55325, St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. Morton
• New Hampshire - 113 A.2d 492 (N.H. 1955), Pratte v. Balatsos
• New Jersey - 96 A. 405 (N.J.Super.Ch. 1915), Class v. Strack
• New Jersey - 76 A.2d 877 (N.J. 1950), No. A--28, Fox v. Snow
• Vermont - 478 A.2d 202 (Vt. 1984), 82-440, Hilder v. St. Peter
• Texas - 489 S.W.2d 335 (Tex.Civ.App.
• Texas - 498 S.W.2d 339 (Tex. 1973), B3857, Doggett v. Nitschke
• Wisconsin - 282 N.W. 585 (Wis. 1938), In re Richardson's Estate
• Wisconsin - 127 N.W.2d 246 (Wis. 1964), Jezo v. Jezo