Opinion concerning whether the Board of the South Carolina Medical Malpractice Liability Insurance Joint Underwriting Association is obligated to defend a suit brought against one or more of its insureds under the provisions of federal antitrust statutes for restraint of trade, and whether the Association and the South Carolina Medical Malpractice Patients Compensation Fund are obligated to pay any damages assessed against insured/members as a result of violations by the insured/members of federal antitrust statutes.
Linked as:
Extract
Opinion concerning whether the Board of the South Carolina Medical Malpractice Liability Insurance Joint Underwriting Association is obligated to defend a suit brought against one or more of its insureds under the provisions of federal antitrust statutes for restraint of trade, and whether the Association and the South Carolina Medical Malpractice Patients Compensation Fund are obligated to pay any damages assessed against insured/members as a result of violations by the insured/members of federal antitrust statutes.
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
This document cites
- New York - Albert J. Schiff Associates, Inc. v. Flack
- Florida - Buckner v. Physicians Protective Trust Fund
- Federal Cases - Washington State Bowling Prop. Ass'n v. Pacific Lanes, Inc.
- South Carolina - South Carolina Medical Malpractice Liability Ins. Joint Underwriting Ass'n v. Ferry
- Nebraska - Marx v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co.
