Opinion concerning whether a provision of Section 56-3-660 of the Code may be construed as creating an undue burden on interstate commerce and therefore violative of the commerce clause of the Federal Constitution.
Linked as:
Extract
Opinion concerning whether a provision of Section 56-3-660 of the Code may be construed as creating an undue burden on interstate commerce and therefore violative of the commerce clause of the Federal Constitution.
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
This document cites
- Federal Cases - Goldberg v. Sweet Gte Sprint Communications Corporation v. Sweet
- Federal Cases - American Trucking Associations, Inc v. Scheiner
- Federal Cases - Complete Auto Transit, Inc v. Brady
- Federal Cases - Armco Inc v. Hardesty
- Federal Cases - Amerada Hess Corporation v. Director, Division of Taxation, New Jersey Department of the Treasury Texaco, Inc v. Director, Division of Taxation, New Jersey Department of the Treasury
