Opinion concerning whether or not the Freedom of Information Act applies to a search committee of a state university, which committee is searching for or interviewing candidates to fill a “public figure” type office. The opinion also addresses whether the Freedom of Information Act can be properly construed to allow recessing and reconvening of executive sessions between cities or across the continent without giving additional notice.
Linked as:
Extract
Opinion concerning whether or not the Freedom of Information Act applies to a search committee of a state university, which committee is searching for or interviewing candidates to fill a “public figure” type office. The opinion also addresses whether the Freedom of Information Act can be properly construed to allow recessing and reconvening of executive sessions between cities or across the continent without giving additional notice.
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
This document cites
- Pennsylvania - Consumers Ed. and Protective Ass'n v. Nolan
- Oklahoma - Carl v. Board of Regents of University of Oklahoma
- New Jersey - Township Committee of South Harrison Tp. v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Gloucester County
- Arizona - Cooper v. Arizona Western College Dist. Governing Bd.
- South Carolina - Knight Pub. Co. v. University of South Carolina, 22851
