Opinion concerning a recent number of proposals requiring a statewide referendum on video poker and clarifying whether an idea allowing voters to decide whether poker payouts will be legal in South Carolina would be legally valid. Proponents of this idea will seek to enact a statute authorizing the holding of the statewide vote.
Linked as:
Extract
Opinion concerning a recent number of proposals requiring a statewide referendum on video poker and clarifying whether an idea allowing voters to decide whether poker payouts will be legal in South Carolina would be legally valid. Proponents of this idea will seek to enact a statute authorizing the holding of the statewide vote.
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
This document cites
- Federal Cases - United States v. 20" Dealer's Choice" Mach. & C. Con. of $3.50
- South Dakota - Poppen v. Walker, 18374
- New York - O'Carroll Rest. Corp. v. New York State Liquor Authority
- Idaho - Westerberg v. Andrus
- North Carolina - Collins Coin Music Co. of North Carolina, Inc. v. North Carolina Alcoholic Beverage Control Com'n
