Opinion concerning a proposed transaction between the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) and Columbia/HCA in which some or all of the capital facilities and equipment of MUSC will either be sold or leased to Columbia/HCA.

This document cites

• Arizona - Kromko v. Arizona Bd. of Regents, 18520-SA
• South Carolina - Bazzle v. Huff, 24317
• Kentucky - Porter v. Hospital Corp. of America, 84-CA-1687-MR
• South Carolina - McKinney v. City of Greenville
• North Carolina - National Medical Enterprises, Inc. v. Sandrock



See all quotations

• Kentucky - Abernathy v. City of Irvine
• South Carolina - Nichols v. South Carolina Research Authority
• South Carolina - Nucor Steel, a Div. of Nucor Corp. v. South Carolina Public Service Com'n, 23761
• North Carolina - Byrd, Matter of
• South Carolina - Johnson v. Piedmont Municipal Power Agency, 21640
• South Carolina - Goodman v. City of Columbia
• Georgia - Bradfield v. Hospital Authority of Muscogee County, 25921
• Ohio - Lazarus v. Board of Commrs. of Hamilton County
• South Carolina - Gilbert v. Bath, 20221
• South Carolina - Bolt v. Cobb
• South Carolina - Elliott v. McNair
• West Virginia - Queen v. West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc.
• Georgia - Richmond County Hosp. Authority v. Richmond County, s. 42571
• South Carolina - Smith v. Robertson
• South Carolina - State v. Broad River Power Co.
• South Carolina - Battle v. Willcox