Opinion as to the validity of Williamsburg County Ordinance No. 2000-02, as amended by Ordinance No. 2005-002 (the “Ordinance”). The Ordinance “ (a) it conflicts with the Emergency Medical Services Act of South Carolina (EMS Act) (Section 44-61-10 et seq.); (b) it is unreasonable restraint on trade; and (c) it violates a Medicare patient’s basic freedom of choice.”
Linked as:
Extract
Opinion as to the validity of Williamsburg County Ordinance No. 2000-02, as amended by Ordinance No. 2005-002 (the “Ordinance”). The Ordinance “ (a) it conflicts with the Emergency Medical Services Act of South Carolina (EMS Act) (Section 44-61-10 et seq.); (b) it is unreasonable restraint on trade; and (c) it violates a Medicare patient’s basic freedom of choice.”
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
This document cites
- South Carolina - U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. City of Newberry
- Wisconsin - American Medical Transport of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Curtis-Universal, Inc.
- Federal Cases - Parker v. Brown
- South Carolina - Town of Hilton Head Island v. Fine Liquors, Ltd.
- South Carolina - Sc State Ports Authority v. Jasper County
