Omak Maritime Ltd v Mamola Challenger Shipping Company Ltd
Linked as:
Extract
Omak Maritime Ltd v Mamola Challenger Shipping Company Ltd
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Core Citations
CONSIDERS
- Filobake Ltd v Rondo Ltd and Another
- Golden Strait Corporation v Nippon Yusen Kubishika Kaisha (the "Golden Victory")
REFERS TO
- Lloyd v Stanbury
- Wertheim v Chicoutimi Pulp Company
- Golden Strait Corporation v Nippon Yusen Kubishika Kaisha (The Golden Victory) [QBD (Comm)]
[See more]
APPLIES
- British Westinghouse Electric and Manufacturing Company Ltd v Underground Electric Railways Company of London Ltd
- Robinson v Harman
CITES
COMMENTS
CONSIDERS
CONSIDERED in
- A v B
- Ampurius Nu Homes Holdings Ltd v Telford Homes (Creekside) Ltd
- Yam Seng Pte Ltd (a Company Registered in Singapore) v International Trade Corporation Ltd
REPORTED OPINION OF in
CITED in
- The Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust v Atos it Services UK Ltd
- Flame SA (Appellant (and respondent in the arbitration) v Glory Wealth Shipping PTE Ltd (Respondent (and claimant in the arbitration)
- Karim Frederick Dhanani v Serge Crasnianski
[See more]
REFERRED in
This document cites
- C. & P. Haulage v Middleton
- Golden Strait Corporation v Nippon Yusen Kubishika Kaisha (the "Golden Victory")
- British Westinghouse Electric and Manufacturing Company Ltd v Underground Electric Railways Company of London Ltd
- Surrey County Council and Another v Bredero Homes Ltd
- Golden Strait Corporation v Nippon Yusen Kubishika Kaisha (The Golden Victory) [QBD (Comm)]
