Octra Nominees Pty Ltd v Chipper

Core Citations

DISTINGUISHES

• Chan v Dainford Ltd

CONSIDERS

• Mackay v Wilson

CITES

• Nationwide Produce (Holdings) Pty Ltd (in Liquidation) v Linknarf Ltd (in Liquidation)
• Farah ConstructIons Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd
• Hunt v Luck

[See more]

• Kling v Keston Properties Ltd
• Tiffany Investments Ltd and another v Bircham & Company Nominees Ltd and Others (No 2)
• Bahr v Nicolay (No.2)
• Hunt v Luck
• Laybutt v Amoco Australia Pty Ltd
• Pritchard v Briggs
• Re Australian Elizabethan Theatre Trust; Lord v Commonwealth Bank of Australia
• Trident General Insurance Company Ltd Vmcniece Bros Pty Ltd
• Tuck and Another v Baker and Others
• Wilson v Darling Island Stevedoring and Lighterage Company Ltd

APPLIES

• Woodroffe v Box

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2006] FCA 1633

APPEAL RESOLVED in

• Octra Nominees Pty Ltd v Chipper

REVERSED in

• Octra Nominees Pty Ltd v Chipper

This document cites

• Farah ConstructIons Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd
• Pritchard v Briggs
• Tiffany Investments Ltd and another v Bircham & Company Nominees Ltd and Others (No 2)
• Re Australian Elizabethan Theatre Trust; Lord v Commonwealth Bank of Australia
• Mackay v Wilson



See all quotations

• Nationwide Produce (Holdings) Pty Ltd (in Liquidation) v Linknarf Ltd (in Liquidation)
• Bahr v Nicolay (No.2)
• Kling v Keston Properties Ltd
• Laybutt v Amoco Australia Pty Ltd
• Chan v Dainford Ltd
• Trident General Insurance Company Ltd Vmcniece Bros Pty Ltd
• Woodroffe v Box
• Wilson v Darling Island Stevedoring and Lighterage Company Ltd
• Hunt v Luck
• Tuck and Another v Baker and Others
• Hunt v Luck