Not Your Coffee Table: An Evaluation of Companion Animals as Personal Property

This document cites

• US Code - 29 U.S.C. § 794 Nondiscrimination Under Federal Grants and Programs
• N v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Texas - Bueckner v. Hamel
• New York - Brousseau v. Rosenthal
• Federal Cases - Majors v. Housing Authority of Dekalb County Ga., 80-7134



See all quotations

• New York - Snyder v. Bio-Lab, Inc.
• Texas - Young's Bus Lines v. Redmon
• Ohio - Cash v. City of Cincinnati
• New York - Zager v. Dimilia
• Alaska - Mitchell v. Heinrichs
• Nebraska - Fackler v. Genetzky
• Indiana - Puckett v. Miller
• West Virginia - Carbasho v. Musulin
• Indiana - Seidner v. Dill, 20110
• New York - Johnson v. Douglas
• New Jersey - Hyland v. Borras
• New York - Stettner v. Graubard
• Wisconsin - Rabideau v. City of Racine
• Washington - Sherman v. Kissinger
• New Jersey - Harabes v. Barkery, Inc.
• New York - People v. Durham
• New York - Corso v. Crawford Dog and Cat Hospital, Inc.
• Oregon Official Reporter - Lockett v. Hill
• Minnesota - Soucek v. Banham, C3-94-1203
• Michigan - Koester v. VCA Animal Hosp.
• Federal Cases - Gluckman v. American Airlines, Inc.
• Michigan - People v. McKnight, Docket No. 48880-1
• Illinois - Leith v. Frost
• Iowa - Nichols v. Sukaro Kennels
• Minnesota - Molenaar v. United Cattle Co.
• Federal Cases - Industries of Vermont, Inc v. Kelco Disposal, Inc
• California - Dillon v. Legg
• Federal Cases - Kaiser v. US, Civ. A. No. 89-1870 SSH.
• Hawaii - Campbell v. Animal Quarantine Station, Division of Animal Industry, Dept. of Agriculture, State of Hawaii, Bd. of Agriculture
• Kentucky - Burgess v. Taylor