Ng Keng Yong v Public Prosecutor and Another Appeal

Core Citations

REFERS TO

• Mah Kah Yew v Public Prosecutor

CONSIDERS

• The Miraflores and The Abadesa; Miraflores (Owners) v George Livanos (Owners)
• Nettleship v Weston

CITES

• The Miraflores and The Abadesa; Miraflores (Owners) v George Livanos (Owners)

FOLLOWS

• The Maloja II
• Public Prosecutor v Azman bin Abdullah
• Public Prosecutor v Choo Thiam Hock and Others

[See more]

• Public Prosecutor v Teo Poh Leng
• The "Teng He"
• Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority
• Lim Ah Poh v Public Prosecutor
• Lim Poh Eng v Public Prosecutor

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2005] 2 LRC 368
• [2004] SGHC 171
• [2004] 4 SLR 89

REFERRED in

• Murugan a/l Arumugam v Public Prosecutor

This document cites

• The Maloja II
• Nettleship v Weston
• Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority
• The Miraflores and The Abadesa; Miraflores (Owners) v George Livanos (Owners)
• The Miraflores and The Abadesa; Miraflores (Owners) v George Livanos (Owners)



See all quotations

• Lee Lai Siew v PP and Voon Wee Hian and Others v PP
• Joseph Chin Saiko; PP
• Adnan bin Khamis v PP
• Lee Kim Leng v R
• The Beryl
• Public Prosecutor v Choo Thiam Hock and Others
• Mah Kah Yew v Public Prosecutor
• Lim Ah Poh v Public Prosecutor
• Public Prosecutor v Azman bin Abdullah
• Public Prosecutor v Teo Poh Leng
• R; Woo Sing and Sim Ah Kow
• Lim Poh Eng v Public Prosecutor
• The "Teng He"
• Merchant Shipping Act 1995
• Penal Code 1871
• Merchant Shipping (Prevention of Collisions at Sea) Regulations