Newcomer v. Clackamas County

Core Citations

MODIFIED BY OTHER CASE in

• Friends of Yamhill Cnty. v. Yamhill Cnty.
• OPUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. CITY OF EUGENE, LUBA No. 94-158 (Or. LUBA 2/23/1995)
• HARRIS v. POLK COUNTY, LUBA No. 91-196 (Or. LUBA 4/17/1992)

[See more]

• Lane County v. Land Conservation and Development Com'n

ABROGATED BY OTHER CASE in

• Mackenzie v. City of Portland
• Bard v. Lane County
• RAMSAY v. LINN COUNTY, LUBA No. 94-202 (Or. LUBA 1/5/1996)

[See more]

• HARWOOD v. LANE COUNTY, LUBA No. 92-001 (Or. LUBA 4/27/1992)
• DEPARTMENT OF LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT v. POLK COUNTY, LUBA No. 96-036 (Or. LUBA 9/10/1996)
• LOUKS v. JACKSON COUNTY, LUBA No. 93-133 (Or. LUBA 1/11/1994)
• BEAVER STATE SAND AND GRAVEL, INC. v. DOUGLAS COUNTY, LUBA No. 2002-065 (Or. LUBA 10/11/2002)
• Craven v. Jackson County
• Kenagy v. Benton County
• Dan Gile and Associates, Inc. v. McIver
• 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Lane County

This document cites

• Oregon Caselaw - Speck Restaurant, Inc. v. Oregon Liquor Control Commission
• Oregon Caselaw - Capsey v. Department of Revenue, State of Or.
• Oregon Caselaw - Rutherford v. Armstrong
• Oregon Caselaw - Apalategui v. Washington County
• Oregon Caselaw - Lane County v. City of Eugene



See all quotations

• US - Reference Stubs - Zoning ordinances establishing exclusive farm use zones; definitions
• US - Reference Stubs - Agricultural land use policy
• US - Reference Stubs - Repealed
• US - Reference Stubs - Uses permitted in exclusive farm use zones in nonmarginal lands counties; rules
• US - Reference Stubs - Uses permitted in exclusive farm use zones in counties that adopted marginal lands system prior to 1993; rules
• US - Reference Stubs - ORS 197.835 Scope of Review; Rules