A new deal for end users? Lessons from a French innovation in the regulation of interoperability.
›
Linked as:Summary
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
Extract
A new deal for end users? Lessons from a French innovation in the regulation of interoperability.
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
This document cites
- Federal Cases - 162 U.S. 184 (1896), Cincinnati, New Orleans and Texas Pacific Railway
- Federal Cases - 167 U.S. 479 (1897), 733, Interstate Commerce Commission v. Cincinnati,
- Federal Cases - 168 U.S. 144 (1897), 203, Interstate Commerce Commission v. Alabama Midland Railway Company
- WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty (WPPT) (1996)
