Petition Of Charles O'neill And William Lauchlan For Judicial Review Of The Prisons And Young Offenders Institutions Rules 2011, Rule 63(8), Etcetera And Answers For The Scottish Ministers

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

Petition Of Charles O'neill And William Lauchlan For Judicial Review Of The Prisons And Young Offenders Institutions Rules 2011, Rule 63(8), Etcetera And Answers For The Scottish Ministers

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

Core Citations

CITES

B (A Child)
R (Purdy) v DPP
Petition Of Charles O'neill And William Lauchlan For Judicial Review Of The Prisons And Young Offenders Institutions Rules 2011, Rule 63(8), Etcetera And Answers For The Scottish Ministers (supplementary Opinion)

[See more]

REPORTED OPINION OF in

2015 Scot (D) 15/10
[2015] GWD 36-580
2015 SLT 811

CITED in

Petition Of Charles O'neill And William Lauchlan For Judicial Review Of The Prisons And Young Offenders Institutions Rules 2011, Rule 63(8), Etcetera And Answers For The Scottish Ministers (supplementary Opinion)

This document cites

Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos y de las Libertades Fundamentales
R (Al-Hasan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Carroll) v Same
Miss Behavin' Ltd v Belfast City Council
R (on the application of B) v Secretary of State for Justice
Dunn v Parole Board

See all quotations