Navaratnam Kugathas v Secretary of State for the Home Department

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v United Kingdom
• Marckx v Belgium

CONSIDERS

• Human Rights Act 1998

CONSIDERED in

• As (Pakistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• MW (Deportation – Jamaica -conducive to the public good)
• R (Ozsayan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

[See more]

• BR (Article 8 - Proportionality - Delay - Shala)
• R(on the application of Natalia Heritage) v Home Secretary
• Kaur (visit appeals; Article 8)
• KG (Gurkhas– overage dependants – policy)
• Tsering Lama v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• TK (Ceasefire-Negotiations_)
• MM (Article 8 – family life – dependency)
• Ht (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for The Home Department
• R Liang v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• MZ (Pakistan) v Entry Clearance Officer
• Etti-Adegbola v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Amina Ali Odawey (Appellant/Claimant) v Entry Clearance Officer (Respondent/Defendant)
• R Bennett v The Secretary of State for TH Home Department
• ILHAN AKBAL v Secretary of State for the Home Department/
• MA (India) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• KM (Article 8 - Family Life)
• MS (Article 8:family life – Extended family)
• NISA v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• TJ (Marriage - Telephone Relationship)
• RR (India) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Secretary of State for the Home Department v ARIF AGA/
• PV & Others (BOC – maintenance – Article 8)
• UQ (Pakistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• NM v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Rajendran (s117B – family life)
• R (on the application of Marie) v Home Secretary
• WAAAW (Family Reunion - Proportionality)
• VM (FGM-risks-Mungiki-Kikuyu/Gikuyu)
• R Dankaro v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• JB & Others (children of former British Overseas citizens – limits of NH)
• KL (Article 8-Lekstaka-delay-near-misses)
• R Chiwondo v Secretary of State for Home Department
• SS (Turkey) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• K v Secretary of State or The Home Department
• R Admir Zymeraj v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• NS (Relevance of children to removal – Art 8)
• Entry Clearance Officer, Sierra Leone v Edna Kopoi
• Sarah Khatoon v The Entry Clearance Officer Islamabad (First Defendant) The Upper Tribunal (immigration & Asylum Chamber) (Second Defendant)
• AH (Article 8 _ ECO _ Rules)
• HS (Bangladesh) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• S. (O.O.) v Minister for Justice, Equality & Law Reform
• Mab (Para 399; "Unduly Harsh")
• Jitendra Rai v Entry Clearance Officer, New Delhi
• Dasgupta (error of law – proportionality – correct approach)
• Kennedy Mwesezi v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• W.L.C v The Minister for Justice
• HB v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Sun Myung Moon (Human rights, entry clearance, proportionality)
• Plan B. Earth v The Prime Minister
• Ghising (family life - adults - Gurkha policy)
• Aminat Saliu v The Entry Clearance Officer
• R and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Nadira Mobeen v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• A (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Housing Department

RELIED UPON in

• UR and Others (Policy; Executive Discretion; Remittal) Nepal

CITED in

• IR (SRI LANKA) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• SG (Nepal)and Another v Entry Clearance Officer — New Delhi
• MA (Pakistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

[See more]

• Dumi v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R Karim Alighanbari v The Secretary of State for The Home Department (First Defendant) First-tier Tribunal (immigration and Asylum Chamber) (Second Defendant)
• KK (India) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Cheryl Ribeli v Entry Clearance Officer, Pretoria
• Aminat Saliu v The Entry Clearance Officer
• Vikas Singh and Another v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Petition Of T A (ap) For Judicial Review Of Decisions By Secretary Of State For Home Department

REFERRED in

• VS (India) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Defendants/Applicant)
• Nn (South Africa) and Another v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• OB (Ukraine) v Entry Clearance Officer

[See more]

• FB (Nigeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Mohammed Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Sun Myung Moon v Entry Clearance Officer, Seoul
• Varpiotas v Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Lithuania
• R (AK (Sri Lanka)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• AA v London Borough of Southwark
• PT (Sri Lanka) v Entry Clearance Officer, Chennai
• IS (Lithuania) v Minister for Justice and Equality
• HK (Turkey) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• A (O) v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform
• F.A.F. (Nigeria) v The Minister for Justice and Equality
• ZB (Pakistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• SENANAYAKE v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Pun and Others (Gurkhas—Policy—Article 8) Nepal
• Asfar Uddin v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
• R (Britcits) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• The King on the application of DM v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• NA (Pakistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Abbas v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Mosnu Ahmed Chowdhury v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• NT 1 and another v Google LLC (Information Commissioner intervening)

APPLIED in

• Mthokozisi v Secretary of State for the Home Department
• Jack Jones v Luton Borough Council
• Gurung v Secretary of State for the Home Department

[See more]

• Adjei (Visit Visas - Article 8)
• Secretary of State for the Home Department v Chioma Goodness Onuorah

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2003] ACD 32
• [2003] INLR 170

This document cites

• Human Rights Act 1998