Nast v Nast and Walker

Core Citations

DISAPPROVES

• A. v A. and H

CONSIDERS

• Re Anderson. Halligay v Kirkley
• Rabbeth v Squire

REFERS TO

• Cavendish v Cavendish
• Tilley v Tilley
• Kennedy v Dodson

[See more]

• Spokes v Grosvenor and West End Railway Terminus Hotel Company
• Hulbert v Hulbert
• Nash v Layton
• Campbell v Campbell, Lewis and Keith

RESUELVE RECURSO

• Nast v Nast and Walker

APPLIES

• Skone v Skone

CONSIDERS

• Civil Evidence Act 1968 - Articles : S-16
• Matrimonial Proceedings and Property Act 1970
• Settled Land Act 1925

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1972] 1 All ER 1171
• [1972] 2 WLR 901
• [1972] Fam 142

This document cites

• Hulbert v Hulbert
• Skone v Skone
• Kennedy v Dodson
• A. v A. and H
• Spokes v Grosvenor and West End Railway Terminus Hotel Company



See all quotations

• Nash v Layton
• Tilley v Tilley
• Re Anderson. Halligay v Kirkley
• Rabbeth v Squire
• Cavendish v Cavendish
• Redfern v Redfern
• Campbell v Campbell, Lewis and Keith
• Matrimonial Proceedings and Property Act 1970
• Settled Land Act 1925
• Civil Evidence Act 1968