Napp Pharmaceutical Holdings Ltd v Dr Reddy's Laboratories (UK) Ltd and Another

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• KCI Licensing Inc. and iothers v Smith & Nephew Plc and Others
• HTC Corpn v Nokia Corpn

[See more]

• Cephalon, Inc. and Others v Orchid Europe Ltd and Others

REFERS TO

• KCI Licensing Inc. and iothers v Smith & Nephew Plc and Others
• Merck Sharp Dohme Corporation and Another v Teva Pharma BV and Another
• Ratiopharm GmBh and another v Napp Pharmaceutical and another

[See more]

• Monsanto Technology LLC v Cargill International SA (No 2)
• Smith & Nephew Plc (Respondent/Appellant) v ConvaTec Technologies Inc. T J Smith & Nephew Ltd and Another (Third Parties)
• Hoechst Celanese Corporation v BP Chemicals Ltd and Another
• R (on the Application of Alvi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [Sup Ct]
• Sienkiewicz v Greif (UK) Ltd; Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council v Willmore

CITES

• Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd v Premium Aircraft Interiors Group
• Kirin-Amgen v Hoechst Marion Roussel Ltd
• H. Lundbeck A/S (Claimant/Part 20 Defendant) v (1) Norpharma Spa (2) Infosint S/A (Defendants/Part 20 Claimants) (3) Lundbeck Ltd and Others (Third, Fourth and Fifth Parties/ Part 20 Defendants)

CONSIDERS

• Patents Act 1977
• Patents Act 1977

CONSIDERED in

• Napp Pharmaceutical Holdings Ltd v DR Reddy's Laboratories (UK) Ltd and Another
• IPCom GmbH & Company KG v Vodafone Group Plc
• Warner-Lambert Company LLC v Sandoz GMBH and Another

[See more]

• Saint-Gobain Adfors S.A.S. (a company existing under the laws of France) v 3M Innovative Properties Company (a company existing under the laws of Delaware, United States)

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2016] All ER D 188 Jun

CITED in

• Actavis Group PTC EHF (a company incorporated under the laws of the state of Iceland) v ICOS Corporation (a company incorporated under the laws of the state of Washington, USA); Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd (a company incorporated under the laws of the st

REFERRED in

• Ipcom Gmbh & Company KG (A Company Incorporated Under the Laws of the Federal Republic of Germany) v (1) Vodafone Group Plc
• The Queen (on the application of Napp Pharmaceuticals Ltd) v Secretary of State for Health acting as the Licensing Authority Sandoz Ltd (Interested Party)

This document cites

• Ta et al. v. Bonis, 2006 SKPC 05
• Merck Sharp Dohme Corporation and Another v Teva Pharma BV and Another
• Cephalon, Inc. and Others v Orchid Europe Ltd and Others
• KCI Licensing Inc. and iothers v Smith & Nephew Plc and Others
• Smith & Nephew Plc (Respondent/Appellant) v ConvaTec Technologies Inc. T J Smith & Nephew Ltd and Another (Third Parties)



See all quotations

• KCI Licensing Inc. and iothers v Smith & Nephew Plc and Others
• Ratiopharm GmBh and another v Napp Pharmaceutical and another
• Kirin-Amgen v Hoechst Marion Roussel Ltd
• H. Lundbeck A/S (Claimant/Part 20 Defendant) v (1) Norpharma Spa (2) Infosint S/A (Defendants/Part 20 Claimants) (3) Lundbeck Ltd and Others (Third, Fourth and Fifth Parties/ Part 20 Defendants)
• Monsanto Technology LLC v Cargill International SA (No 2)
• HTC Corpn v Nokia Corpn
• Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd v Premium Aircraft Interiors Group
• Hoechst Celanese Corporation v BP Chemicals Ltd and Another
• Murad & Foo v Perbadanan Pembangunan Pulau Pinang; Ong Chin Lee
• Patents Act 1977
• R (on the Application of Alvi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [Sup Ct]
• Sienkiewicz v Greif (UK) Ltd; Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council v Willmore
• DIRECTIVE 2004/48/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights (Text with EEA relevance)