Namu of 2002 v Department of Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs

Core Citations

DISTINGUISHES

• Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v X

REFERS TO

• Castlemaine Tooheys Ltd v South Australia
• W228 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs

CONSIDERS

• Hempel v Moore
• Bercove v Hermes
• Stirling Harbour Services Pty Ltd v Bunbury Port Authority (No 2)

CITES

• Oshlack v Richmond River Council
• Milne v Attorney-General (Tasmania)
• Latoudis v Casey

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [2002] FCA 999

DISTINGUISHED in

• VFAD of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs

FOLLOWED in

• Williams v Minister for the Environment and Heritage

CONSIDERED in

• Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union(Plaintiff) v Commissioner, Australian Federal Police (First Defendant)
• Gj(Appellant) v as

This document cites

• Bercove v Hermes
• Hempel v Moore
• Stirling Harbour Services Pty Ltd v Bunbury Port Authority (No 2)
• W228 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
• Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v X



See all quotations

• Castlemaine Tooheys Ltd v South Australia
• Latoudis v Casey
• Oshlack v Richmond River Council
• Milne v Attorney-General (Tasmania)