Mutasa v Attorney General

Core Citations

CONSIDERS

• Southern Rhodesia Act 1965 - Articles : S-1
• Southern Rhodesia Act 1965 - Articles : S-2
• Crown Proceedings Act 1947 - Articles : S-40

[See more]

• China Navigation Company Ltd v Attorney-General

REFERS TO

• Franklin v Attorney General
• Pyx Grainite Company Ltd v Ministry of Housing and Local Government
• Attorney General v Tomline

APPLIES

• China Navigation Company Ltd v Attorney-General

REPORTED OPINION OF in

• [1979] 3 All ER 257
• 78 ILR 490
• 144 JP 105

[See more]

• [1979] 3 WLR 792
• [1980] QB 114

CITED in

• Egan v Willis
• R (Abassi and another) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and another

CONSIDERED in

• Hicks v Ruddock
• Setka v Carroll and Others
• Rose v Boxing NSW Inc. — anor

[See more]

• Salijah bte Ab Latef v Mohd Irwan bin Abdullah Teo
• Cappelleri v Cappelleri

REFERRED in

• Habib v Commonwealth of Australia (No 2)

This document cites

• Convenio Europeo para la Protección de los Derechos Humanos y de las Libertades Fundamentales
• Vine v National Dock Labour Board
• Pyx Grainite Company Ltd v Ministry of Housing and Local Government
• Attorney General v Tomline
• China Navigation Company Ltd v Attorney-General



See all quotations

• Attorney General v Tomline
• China Navigation Company Ltd v Attorney-General
• Franklin v Attorney General
• Southern Rhodesia Act 1965
• Crown Proceedings Act 1947
• British Nationality Act 1948
• Southern Rhodesia Constitution Order 1965